The interactions between paintings and poems have long been considered as a unique way of the artist's expression because they convey similar messages. Painters and poets have always experimented with both mediums in the early centuries. When painters began illustrating with poetry, they discovered much beyond their imagination and learned how the two mediums could complement each other. Painting and poetry often work in tandem to convey ideas and express different emotions.
A painting by Peter Bruegel 'the wedding dance," is a widely viewed painting with the various translation of its meaning. The painting has strong indecent elements that reveal the secret lives of the peasants with colorful pictures (Laïdi, 2008). One of the notable observations is the couple kissing with their back facing the observer (Laïdi, 2008). Similarly, Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, written by William Carlos Williams, is a poem written in twenty-four lines separated by sets of lines to convey different emotions depending on how one translates it.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Brueghel's painting represented the northern European culture of his times, instead of glorifying the human body and showing the humbleness and the attitudes that shows commonality (Williams, 1962). The painting revealed the interaction between humans based on their facial expressions. Breughel does not show any complicated express; instead, he intends to focus on human relations more. Similarly, Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, written by William Carlos Williams, is a poem written in twenty-four lines separated by sets of lines. The title and the content describe the painting by Pieter Brueghel.
Using short stanzas, the poem is more of a play within a painting. The speaker describes spring in which Icarus fell, Pieter Brueghel depicts this scene with the plowing farmer, and the color choices make it real, William idea of the plowing season using pageantry of scenes (Williams, 1962). In the other lines, the poem draws the reader's attention to different sceneries such as the young man Icarus who had flown closer to the sun and drowning in the bay. This can be perceived as a tragedy, but for the young man, no one seems to notice, and in the final line, Williams terms death to be insignificant. In another set of lines is used to describe feelings that are similar in tone presented in the poem. William Carlos's poem also depicts the same human interaction.
Although the poem is simple, he uses words that cannot be easily discovered as an expression of emotion. This does not imply that the author did not have any feelings but did not want to dwell in emotions that might not achieve what he intended to portray (Priollaud & Siritzky, 2008). In reference to humans like the farmer and the poem also centers on the Landscape on how nature takes precedence over humans. The poem praises nature, for example, when it says," 'the whole pageantry / of the year / was awake tingling' or 'concerned with itself'(Williams, 1962). Most poems are not about emotional expression, or the author people can express their feeling, but it is not easy to precisely understand if it about feelings
The poem is more of using words as machines. Thus William emphasizes concept; therefore, the poem becomes a tool that represents reality in the present. The poem is a representation of shapes through stanza and rhythm, which can be equated to lines in each of the verses (Laïdi, 2008). The poem utilizes the elect of poetry to emphasize the experience that is a representation of the painting. The poem uses language as its main element as a communication tool and vast elements to express emotion. Words used by the author in the poem states that "near the edge of the sea is confusing, the word 'Near' hangs in a single line, for example, suspends our breath on 'near'(Williams, 1962). At the end of the line, the reader cannot know what it means.
William does not reveal what is to be read, meaning that the poem has multiple meanings, depending on how the observer sees it; both sides are correct. The poem and the painting have more than one sense, and the more you read or observe, the more you see a new purpose. William uses his creativity to play with words and make significant representations beyond the usual meaning of words. The two comparisons show that poetry and painting are intertwined since painting has a hidden language, the same as poetry, with a different description. The painting can be described with diverse meanings.
For a poem, language is essential, which is more of an art. Language is equated to graphical signs. William's poem is more of a painting, meaning that it is an imitation of the artifact the author wants to describe and represent. However, like other artistic presentations, it diverges from the norm to generate different meanings like what painting seeks to represent. Language has a dimension of sound that can be interpreted or imitated. The visual of the poem gives it a visual representation that can be presented with visible shapes since it activated various representation strategies, which is not dependent on the work itself.
References
Laïdi, Z. (2008). Norms over force: the enigma of European power . Springer.
Priollaud, F. X., & Siritzky, D. (Eds.). (2008). Le Traité de Lisbonne: commentaire, article par
article, des nouveaux traités européens (TUE-TFUE) . La documentation française..
Williams, W. C. (1962). Landscape with the Fall of Icarus. Pictures from Brueghel and other .
