Part 1
My party name is the Green Conservative Movement. Its domestic policy would uphold a stronger control of civil matters by the state governments with only the issues of defence and foreign affairs being left to the Federal Government. Taxation and finance would be handled at the state level with the Federal Government getting its funding from the state government not from the populace. This would allow a high level of autonomy for the states to manage their affairs.
The economic policy would allow for a free market but not extreme capitalism. Quality of life for the populace would be more important than non-interference with private entities. Through taxation, legislation, and the judicial process, the state governments would not shy away from imposing a form of superintendence over the private sector in order to protect the populace. Environmental preservation would also be of primary focus. Companies that went out of their way to do what is right for the populace and the environment would be feted and rewarded. On the other hand, companies that overly exploited the populace more so in the arena of basic commodities such as food and pharmaceutical products would be reprimanded and chastised. The people would come first, not the economy.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
With regard to foreign policy, America would be for Americans first with any international endeavors coming a distant second. The military would be big enough and funded enough to protect America without the added obligation of policing the world. Any international activities by the American forces would either emanate from direct threats to the USA by that country or sanctioned and funded operations by the UN. Further, America would seek to pursue peace with all peace loving parties of the world and avoid conflict whenever possible.
Part II
The domestic policy of the Green Conservative Party (Greens) is more inclined to that of the Democratic Party (DP) than that of the Republic Party (GOP). The GOP has always favored a powerful central government which controls even civil matters. The DP has supported a stronger state control of civil matters with the federal government being relegated to superintendence (Ganzach, 2016). A good example is during the rundown for the Civil War when the DP was pushing for a stronger devolution and the GOP pushed for a more central government (Rosino & Hughey, 2016).
With regard to economic policies, once again the Greens would be more inclined to agree with the DP than the GOP but only in some issues. The GOP believes in an extreme form of capitalism where the market alone determines the fate of the economy (Ganzach, 2016). Any interference by government would be seen as eventually ruinous to the economy. The DP on the other hand in some ways put the populace before macroeconomic considerations. A good example is the issue of universal health which the GOP prefers to leave to market dynamics while the DP advocates for proviso of universal primary health (Rosino & Hughey, 2016). With regard to protection of the environment, the current GOP government believes that Global Warming is a myth while the DP supports measures to curb it in line with the Greens Policy.
The foreign policies of the Greens do not seem to agree with any of the two major parties generally though a few similarities can be perceived. The role of America as the global policeman has been supported by both the GOP and the DP in equal measure as opposed to the position taken by the Greens (Ganzach, 2016). A powerful military juggernaut is however more of a GOP preserve than a DP one as the DP believes in amicable settlement of disputes before resulting to war. Finally, both parties support use of military force to protect foreign economic interests of the USA which in many ways is counter-productive while the Greens believe we only go to war when America itself is attacked (Rosino & Hughey, 2016).
References
Ganzach, Y. (2016). Cognitive ability and party identity: No important differences between Democrats and Republicans. Intelligence , 58 , 18-21.
Rosino, M. L., & Hughey, M. W. (2016). Who's invited to the (political) party: race and party politics in the USA? Ethnic and Racial Studies , 39 (3), 325-332.
