Question One
Extract
Policies designed to solve environmental problems are unlikely to succeed unless they have broad public support, but the motives for mass support are poorly understood. The problem is global in scope, but most of the relevant public opinion research done so far has been carried out in advanced industrial societies, usually Western democracies. Moreover, much of this research is limited to the tip of the iceberg, focusing on what people think about environmental problems without probing into why they think it or how deeply they are committed. The analysis of mass attitudes toward environmental problems in this article uses evidence from representative national surveys of countries representing the entire developmental spectrum, from rich to poor nations, including not only Western democracies but also authoritarian regimes and recently emerging democracies from the former communist bloc. The data come from the 1990–93 World Values survey, carried out in 43 countries containing 70% of the world's population. Our goal is to determine why given publics are—or are not—sufficiently concerned about environmental problems that they are willing to make financial sacrifices and undertake other actions in order to help protect the environment.
Paraphrase
Inglehart (2015) centers his discussions on the roles played by citizens in the conservation of the environment. In the article, the author notes the importance of the involvement of citizens of a given nation in the conservation of the environment. Taking good care of the environment has some advantages as noted in the article. Environmental conservation helps in the limitation of the harmful effects of global warming. In the western democracies countries, there is more sensitization of the roles played by the citizens in the conservation of the environment. In the article, the author claims that the environmental conservation level is depended upon the economic level of the country (Inglehart, 2015). For examples, the author states that in industrialized countries, there have been certain measures put in place by the government to limit the harmful effects of human-caused actions to the environment. Through such measures, the citizens are expected to play by the environmental rules set by the relevant authorities in the respective country.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Question Two
Why is it important to analyze articles critically?
The critical analysis of articles is important since it aids the process of understanding the points discussed by the authors. Critical analysis helps in determining the various instances where the author has not explained the points as they are supposed to be in reality. In addition, critical analysis of articles assists in extracting the required information in an article effectively due to complete scrutiny of the author’s discussions. Therefore, through critical analysis of articles, the writing criteria of the author can also be determined which is crucial to understanding the subject under discussion.
Why are scholarly sources more important for academic research?
Scholarly sources are important to academic research since they are the most appropriate when to comes to giving facts as they are in reality. In most instances, scholarly sources normally depend on proven data rather than mere guesswork (Barnhurst, K. G. 2015). Therefore, when it comes to extracting correct information, scholarly sources are the best since they rely on proven methods of research before they are published.
References
Inglehart, R. (2015). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics , 28 (1), 57-72.
Barnhurst, K. G. (2015). Contradictions in news epistemology: how modernism failed mainstream US journalism . Media, Culture & Society, 37 (8), 1244-1253.
