The program selected for evaluation is Health Science research. This covers a vast scope of research case studies, for instance, drug usage, and health-related topics such as weight loss and obesity. This research area is commonly known for its complexity (Moore et al., 2015). A recommended program evaluation model for this research area would be the MRC guidance model. This is because it brings in its feasibility structure because of its random nature. This matches well with the research scope which requires assessment within trials.
The benefit of the MRC process evaluation method is that it beneficial to the scholars, investors and the reviewers as well. This is because one of the strict rules followed when developing MRC is that documents such as drafts, literature review, case studies and much more need to be produced, which are then accepted by an MRC panel (Bryson et al., 2011).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The concern that the stakeholders might have about this solution is having a definite professional interest in the evaluation, or probably seeing it intimidating. Also, another concern is if the evaluation is independent of the stakeholders so that the credibility and honesty of the report are ensured (Moore et al., 2015).
The concern of the evaluation seeming to be threatening can be addressed by fostering good relationships between the evaluators and the stakeholders. Also, to ensure the credibility of the report and transparency, the evaluators need to ensure mindful reporting to the stakeholders to address this challenge. To ensure that the frequent reports to the stakeholders do not compromise the final report, the evaluators need to be mindful of the stages when engagement with the stakeholders is involved and limit it to the feasibility stage.
References
Bryson, J. M., Patton, M. Q., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach, and toolkit. Evaluation and program planning , 34 (1), 1-12.
Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., ... & Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 350 , h1258.
