Annotated Bibliography
Tamborini, C., Reznik, G., & Couch, K. (2016). Work Disability among Women. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 57 (1), 98-117.
Tamborini, Reznik, and Couch (2016) assess how separation and divorce through midlife influence the successive likelihood of work-limiting health in American women. Health conditions, which prevent or limit people from working, establish a significant research and policy concern (Tamborini, Reznik & Couch, 2016). The authors also use work disability history and retrospective marital from the SIPP (Survey of Income and Program Participation) and compare them to Social Security salaries records. Additionally, Tamborini, Reznik, and Couch (2016) identify wives whose initial marriage ended during 1975 to 1984 and those who stay married.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
According to Tamborini, Reznik, and Couch (2016), “a complication of work disability as an indicator of poor health is that it reflects the interaction of a health condition with the social and physical environment. Social factors, such as the presence of a spouse, education, and financial resources, may influence a person’s ability to work.” Therefore, this explains the changing aspects of a work atmosphere, which include divorce. It shows different methods through which coordination, motivation, and direct economic action is attained.
Poortman A, and Kalmijn M. (2002). “Women’s Labor Market Position and Divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating Economic Interpretations of the Work Effect.” European Journal of Population 18(2):175–202.
The article investigates the effect a woman's job on the danger of divorce, utilizing evidence from the Netherlands. Poortman and Kalmijn (2002) examine economic understandings concerning effects of work by unravelling the effects into 5 dimensions: (a) the power of a wife’s work, (b) the position the wife's work, (c)possible labor market achievement, (d) comparative labor marketplace success (vis-à-vis the man), and (e) the separation of home labor.
The results of the authors show that employed women have a twenty-two percent higher divorce risk compared to unemployed women. Subsequently, findings from Poortman and Kalmijn (2002) show that there lacks significant positive outcome of a woman's economic work-related status on separation and that the labor market prospects have a little outcome. Additionally, the effect of labor division on divorce is unrelated, nonsymmetrical, and does not spread to domestic labor (Poortman and Kalmijn, 2002). Overall, these discoveries do not back economic explanations concerning work effect and endorse earlier criticisms stating that sociological understandings are more assuring.
Poortman A. (2005). Women’s Work and Divorce: A Matter of Anticipation? A Research Note. European Sociological Review. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci019
In this article, poortman addresses the most common theory on the advantageous between divorce and women’s work is that a woman’s job increases the danger of divorce. Various critics maintain that the fundamental direction is women should adjust the hours that they work in keenness of divorce (Poortman, 2005). These competing theories are tested through comparison of the effects of women’s work amid divorces, which differ in the extent to which they were anticipated. Since wives who do not anticipate a divorce are unable to regulate their working determinations before the divorce , the author argues that, if the preventive behavior is involved, the consequence of women’s work must be minor when divorce comes unexpectedly. The outcomes lend weak provision for anticipatory behavior.
The consequence of women’s full-time work is lesser for unexpected divorces. Nonetheless, the consequence of full-time labor is also comparatively strong if the divorce is completely unexpected (Poortman, 2005). Therefore, this suggests that whatever affects women directly may destabilize the country’s economy. An interesting topic is a connection between income the occurrence of divorces and productivity.
Lyle, B. (2012). After Divorce, Women Rebound Faster but Stay in Poverty Longer .
According to the article by Lyle (2012), women create the majority of taxpayers within the United States, and it is in no individual’s best interest to keep women in poverty. However, the author notes that according to the Australian Institute of Family Studies, men take a longer emotional recovery period from a divorce compared to women. Nonetheless, women undergo a longer-lasting economic hit. The author notes that for divorcing women with children, a reasonable divorce settlement could be the change between a decent life and poverty.
Therefore, the author advises that by increasing learning levels for women, it will help them escape poverty. According to a September story in Inside Higher Ed in 2010, currently, women are the majority in many graduate and undergraduate programs (Lyle, 2012). Additionally, on February 23 2012, The New York Times identified the same occurrence in an article on America bachelor degrees (Lyle, 2012). Therefore, this shows that women are apparently at the center of the survival of the economic system.
Killewald, A. (2016). Money, Work, and Marital Stability . Assessing Change in the Gendered Determinants of Divorce
In her writing, Killewald (2016) mentions that conclusions remain elusive and findings mixed despite significant literature examining how spouses’ division of labor and earnings related to the risk of divorce. Primary unresolved questions include a) if the primary stability of marriages is connected to the economic advances to a marriage or with a gendered lens that spouses’ employment and earnings are interpreted. Another unresolved question is (b) marital stability determinants have changed.
The author in this journal uses data from 1968 – 2013 Panel Study of Income Dynamics waves as part of her study. The writer considers how spouses’ overall financial resources, a wife’s aptitude to care for herself in the case of a divorce, and how their division of labor are connected to the danger of divorce. Additionally, she investigates how these relations are different between couples married after and before 1975. According to Killewald (2016) financial considerations, the total household income and wives’ economic independence are unpredicted of divorce in either group. Therefore, the article shows how women deal with societal difficulties including divorce.
Sayer L. C., and Bianchi S. M. (2000). Women's Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce. A Review and Reexamination.
In the article, Sayer and Bianchi (2000) inquire if a wife's or women’s economic freedom increase the risk of divorce or destabilize marriage. The authors utilize the National Survey of Households and Families’ longitudinal data and only discover weak support concerning the thesis of economic independence. The article identifies an initial constructive connotation between divorce and a woman's percentage support to family income. However, the association is decreased to no significance when variables gauging gender dogma are introduced in the model (Sayer and Bianchi, 2000).
Sayer and Bianchi (2000) analysis shows that satisfaction measures and those of marital commitment are important predictors of matrimonial dissolution compared to those of economic freedom. This powerfully advocates that the independence effect discovered in previous research that did not comprise controls for the quality of marriages, may have been determining the role of women’s economic freedom in leaving bad marriages, not in leaving all marriages. Therefore, the article’s primary findings are if the theoretical claim that a woman who is undergoing a divorce or is already divorced is still required blending into the two situations and achieving significant success.
Uunk W., (2004). The Economic Consequences of Divorce for Women in the European Union: The Impact of Welfare State Arrangements. European Journal of Population . Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 251–285
Increasing rates of divorce and increasing concerns about the dependency welfare urge the problem of whether well-being state preparations moderate the bad economic significances of divorce (Uunk, 2004). In the article, the author answers the question by matching the temporary economic effects of divorce for all women throughout the European Union 14 Member States. The author utilizes longitudinal data from 1994 to 2000 European Community Household Panel survey. According to Uunk (2004), “I demonstrate that the Member States differ in the extent to which women suffer economically from divorce.” However, multivariate studies show that well-being state preparations displeasure the economic significances of separation for the women.
In this article as well, an expectation of the results of the study is that the issue of divorce has significantly been inspired with the current drastic variations in the sex roles’ perception. Closely inclined to the probable discovery is the legitimacy of the new insights posted that the women are required to work and perform household duties in the end. The concepts in the subjects indicate them as variables within the economic system where their coordination and arrangements generate the economic system stability.
References
Killewald, A. (2016). Money, Work, and Marital Stability . Assessing Change in the Gendered Determinants of Divorce
Lyle, B. (2012). After Divorce, Women Rebound Faster but Stay in Poverty Longer.
Poortman A, and Kalmijn M. (2002). “Women’s Labor Market Position and Divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating Economic Interpretations of the Work Effect.” European Journal of Population 18(2):175–202.
Poortman A. (2005). Women’s Work and Divorce: A Matter of Anticipation? A Research Note. European Sociological Review. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci019
Sayer L. C., and Bianchi S. M. (2000). Women's Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce. A Review and Reexamination.
Tamborini, C., Reznik, G., & Couch, K. (2016). Work Disability among Women. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 57 (1), 98-117.
Uunk W., (2004). The Economic Consequences of Divorce for Women in the European Union: The Impact of Welfare State Arrangements. European Journal of Population . Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 251–285
