Objective, Means, and Methods of Participation
The primary objective of participation is to create a bond between the counselor and counselee in a bid to ensuring that the counselee remains comfortable in all approaches undertaken by the counselor. In other words, this means that the primary objective of enhancing participation is to ensure that the counselee develops a certain level of trust that would be of value in determining the ultimate outcomes of therapy. In therapy, trust is one of the fundamental elements to consider, as it determines the possibility of a patient opening up or providing all necessary information that would help in the treatment process. From that perspective, it is evident that participation would remain a fundamental element to consider, as this would seek to determine the overall levels of trust created between a counselor and counselor.
Regarding the means of participation, the critical aspect to consider is that participation would only come about depending on the overall connection that a counselor and counselee may have during the therapy session. The counselor may opt to utilize a wide array of tools as part of understanding the means of participation, which include tools that may assist in ensuring that the counselee understands his or her role in promoting participation. However, it is equally essential for the counselee to understand specific areas that would require his or her participation, as well as, the levels of participation expected. From that perspective, the counselor would need to adopt a wide array of means focused on promoting participation from all notable perspectives.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Lastly, a counselor may adopt a spiritual community approach as the primary method of participation considering that it creates some form of avenue for enhanced participation from both parties. The spiritual community approach indicates that participation is determined by how all parties are included in all aspects of the community, as this would seek to determine the overall levels of progress achieved (Dobson, 2017). In this case, the counselor must come up with practical strategies that seek to create that avenue from which a counselee would understand the value of his or her participation. In the long-term, this would seek to promote or expand the need for a counselee to participate in all aspects associated with a delivery of expected results as part of promoting positive outcomes.
Structure for Authority, Communication, and Topic Facilitation
Regarding the structure for authority, one of the critical aspects to consider is that the counselor or therapist is the only party with the highest authority during therapy, as he or she must seek to come up with a practical approach for treatment. On the other hand, the counselee would have the authority regarding whether the treatment delivered matches his or her expectations.
Communication is one of the critical elements that would seek to define whether the therapy sessions achieve their intended outcomes considering that a counselee must be willing to communicate or share information efficiently (Dobson, 2017). On the part of the counselor, he or she must come up withan a communication platform from which to share information regarding what is expected from the therapy sessions.
Topic facilitation would depend wholly on the communication models that the counselor and counselee adopt considering that communication would seek to drive the conversations during the therapy sessions. One of the key challenges that may arise or may be expected during topic facilitation is that the counselee may be ready and willing to share information on some topics when compared to others. Ultimately, this creates a challenge for the counselor in determining the topics that the counselee would be more comfortable in defining the success.
Reference
Dobson, R. (2017). A Cloud of Witnesses: Family and Community in Early Twentieth Century Wiregrass Pentecostal Evangelism. Alabama Review , 70 (1), 50-82.
