State political culture is a set of beliefs that are confined within a certain geographical area thereby, governing those within these areas. In the United States, each state is governed by different laws due to the political and cultural differences that set the many states apart from each other. Due to the difference between the states in terms of political culture, a common understanding with regards to the matter of laws that shall govern all states on issues such as gun control, gay marriages, marijuana legalization abortion and education may never be reached.
The primary purpose of the state and local government is to provide services to the population under its laws. In the case of universities, students in public universities pay lower fees due to the fact that state governments help in as far as the provision of subsidies to lower tuition fees is concerned. Bringing all states under one law may be unfair in this case. The number of public universities in different states vary. This means that a state with less universities may end up using its taxpayer money to support universities in other states. Again, the number of students in a state may be way high, comparing the same with the numbers in other states. The enactment of common laws, if any, would in this case add expenses to states with less students, as they will be forced to use their tax to balance out the cost of university education across the nation.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Daniel Elazar uses three types of state political culture which are moralistic, individualistic and traditionalistic. Moralistic culture uses politics as a means to achieve a good and just society. The individualistic one use politics and government to achieve individual goals and traditionalistic shows dominance of politics and government by elites. All states have different views on politics and government, depending on the culture that geographically dominates them. This means that it would be so difficult to bring all states under the same laws as they have different cultures on politics and government and no culture is more superior to the other.
In conclusion, it is evident that all states have different cultures, political stands and ways as to how they deal with the issues affecting them. It would therefore be a great risk to bring all sates under the same laws as this would bring chaos due to misunderstandings on the matter of their cultures and beliefs. This explains the establishment of common laws, spelling out the same approaches to public governance across the nation as being highly unnecessary. Each state should, therefore, be governed by its own rules even though the federal government has in place laws that establish common grounds in the name of the protection of national interests.
