Introduction and Summary
The article articulates the ethics of work station, especially during drug testing. The point of argument in the article revolves around the ethical justification for drug testing. In that, drug testing is not considered as the worker’s right in the employment rules. However, it is viewed as a way in which the employer may block the dangers associated by workers who abuse drugs.
Main Point and Support
Cranford supports his claim by citing that employers are justified in taking part in drug tests to ascertain the level of workers to perform as required by their employment contract. The author holds that it is the general responsibility of the employer to mitigate any danger that is likely to be carried out workplace activities hence the need to conduct drug testing to the employees.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
What evidence supports the main point?
Cranford main claim is supported by the notion that it is the role of the working place to determine how effective the employee can be in the task given. Thus, they are morally allowed to conduct drug testing to their employees since failure to do so may put the safety and health of other people working at the corporation at risk. This initiative will play a significant role in minimizing or eradicating drug-related harms.
Application of the topic in professional life
This subject applies in my professional life as a doctor since medical practitioners are expected to be productive, uphold integrity in the hospital and enhance safety to the patients and other employees. Therefore, despite the privacy issues raised, drug testing in the workplace can be justified because the general public would be adversely sensitive to any perception that workers failed to obey the moral code and legal requirement set by the law.
Application of the topic in an organization
The topic of drug testing can apply in the national government organizations such as law enforcement agencies. This implies that the use of the drug in the workplace impairs an individual’s integrity and honesty. Thus, police officers who fail to do drug testing while on duty are mostly linked with drug dealers hence developing chances for corruption, compromise, and blackmail.
Leadership in corporate culture
Leaders should reflect moral behaviours in their places of work since the employees look upon them for guidance. In most instances, leaders are seen doing exactly the opposite of what they tell their workers to do. Leaders should not have a special set of rules, if they would wish their employees to be responsible, honorable, and respectful they should be able to have such attributes and the workers will learn from them.
Inherent unethical practices with drug testing
In my view, there are no inherent unethical practices because if one does not want to adhere to the employer's terms of service then he or she do not deserve to be given the opportunity to work in that organization. There is no reason why an individual should refuse to do drug testing not unless they are afraid that their employer will find out they have traces of drugs in their system.
Conclusion
I believe that there is no ethical issue in performing drug tests to the workers. Employers should be obligated to drug test their employees regularly. In that, the employees are the representatives of the organization they work for. Therefore, employers have the right to find out what is in their system for both safety and productive purposes.
