There are several interventions and factors that alleviate the risk of suicidal cases. These factors can either be direct or indirect, communal, individualistic or relational in nature. Some of these risk factors include history of suicidal cases in the family, anxiety, aggressiveness and impulsiveness, religious and cultural beliefs, deteriorated physical and mental health, failure to seek help or advice, loss of job, loved ones or relationship among other factors. This essay mainly describes the appropriate interventions for low-risk, and high-risk suicidal clients as well why they are appropriate.
Appropriate interventions are those that directly focus on treating suicidal behaviors, ideations and disorders related to behavioral health by applying effective techniques. Evidence -based interventions and treatment are meant to directly aim at these suicide (Jobes, 2012). One of these interventions is the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention (CBT-SP) which is theoretically based on the tenets of cognitive behavior therapy as well as other therapies related to suicide especially of adults and adolescents with depression. Collaborative assessment and management of suicidality is an intervention designed to boost the therapeutic feeling and motivate the clients (Ten & Henriques, 2015).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The other intervention is the non-demand caring contacts whereby individuals with high and low suicide risk are closely monitored after being discharged from hospitals or mental institutions. For instance they are telephoned and sent postcards which they in turn respond to. This keep them engaged. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is also a critical intervention with the high suicide risk individuals. In this intervention, there is an integration of change and acceptance. Research-informed interventions are those that are founded on clinical practice and research however lack a supportive body.
These interventions are appropriate in dealing with low-risk and high-risk clients since they have proven to be effective in minimizing suicidal cases (Jobes, 2012). They foster support and boost relationships among the clients and the mental and medical institutions. They also impart the clients with necessary skills in conflict resolution.
References
Jobes, D. A. (2012). The collaborative assessment and management of suicidality (CAMS): An evolving evidence-based clinical approach to suicidal risk. Washington, DC: Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.
Ten, H. & Henriques, G. R. (2005). Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: A randomized controlled trial. Minnesota: Routledge Publishers.
