Tactics that are most appropriate for achieving these different goals
Iranian atomic energy ambitions are a threat to international peace and stability. A nuclear-armed Iran means there will be atomic propagation in the middle east. For nations around to get to a position to counter the possible threats, it calls for an equally complex strategy. From a personal standpoint, Iran can still pursue their desires. First, if Iran opts out of the various blocks that hinder the enactment of their program, it would give the nation a free opportunity to exercise the desire to bring forth the nuclear weapon program. Secondly, as negotiations with the various blocks happen, the Iranian government ought to make haste and ensure their milestones are achieved before they pull out (De Mesquita, 2014). Lastly, there are plans to cease energy supply in the form of oil to Iran from significant oil importers. The Iranian government should design ways of obtaining oil such as sourcing oil from the old wells. The Iranian government benefits by first keeping the bargaining power high for foreign policies. Secondly, it can also be assumed to be a form of security from external attacks. Thirdly, it also creates room for innovation and scientific advancements. Forth it counterbalances nations with equal capabilities regarding weapons, and lastly, it gives room for strategic dominance in the region.
Obstacles to achieving the goals of the plan
Despite having some benefits to the nation, the nuclear weapon program closes doors for many other opportunities. From a political standpoint, a political regime is significantly influenced by superpower nations such as the U.S and the trade blocks. In efforts to defend the program, political disintegration will prevail. The current political climate is calm due to the negotiations happening between the different stakeholders. No nation is self-sufficient. When countries in collaboration with Iran pulls out, that means there will be an economic gap created and hence lead to inflation (De Mesquita, 2014).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Effect of stress on policy making
To make policies, one has to weigh the possible outcomes. When stressed, decision making could be influenced by emotions other than reasoning. Systems are laws that affect some stakeholders and thus being in a sober mind helps substantially in thinking clearly and considering all the available opinions and options one gets to a position to formulate a sound policy (Birkland, 2015). From Rosatti’s article, it is said that even animals exhibit context-sensitive choices (Santos & Rosati, 2015). When stress plays a role in making an informed decision, then decision stands as bias.
Impact of personal experience and personality on decision making
Decisions can never be identical both in magnitude and enactment, but they are all reliant on the intellectual approach of their decision-makers. The mediators could be assessed by their distinct familiarity regarding the issue, the steadfastness aptitude of each one of them, their wishes and benefits and the moral and ethical values that lead them. From the definition, personality influences patterns in a person’s activities and articulated attitudes. It is certain that a person's personality can steer him or her towards a particular career path, it is still not logical to proclaim that an extrovert or an introvert cannot learn in an industry of employment (Birkland, 2015). Personality could lead a person to have specific preferences, and that would result in cognitive biases. It is through sensory intuitive that a person collects information while judging thinking-feeling shows how people prefer to making decisions. The human brain is wired in a way that in a distressful situation the brain extracts data of a similar happening and hence influences how to go about in the current case. Personal experience could not be the best mode of policy making because there are constant changes in laws in different areas.
References
Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.
De Mesquita, B. B. (2014). 18. Predicting the future to shape the future. Predicting the Future in Science, Economics, and Politics, 474.
Santos, L. R., & Rosati, A. G. (2015). The evolutionary roots of human decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66, 321-347.
