Three most effective and efficient fundraiser models that will be of benefit to me and my school are Public Provider, Policy Innovator, and Beneficiary Brokers. Public Provider modeloffers essential social services and education to the needy in the community (Hall 2002). The initiative receives funding from diverse sources hence has a bigger funding base apart from the government. Outsource funding reduces dependence on single financial providers. Public provider assists students in preparation for school through focusing on bicultural and bilingual needs of students’ families. For instance; TMC is a public provider that was established in 1971. The program now receives funding from different financiers like local, state, and federal government sources.
The second model is Policy Innovator. Youth villages depend on policy innovator funding from the government. The model addresses social issues that have been left out in government funding programs (Tindall 2010). The model provides most effective solution to existing problems using fewer resources than the existing government programs. The model is likely to attract government funding because it adopts traditional solutions. The models proofs to the government that their programs will work in provision of services. The approach provides a platform to cultivate better relationship with governments’ official that advocates for change. Therefore, this model is the best to use considering the magnitude of benefits to the beneficiary.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The last model is Beneficiary Brokers. Here nonprofit programs compete with each other in provision of backed or government services to beneficiaries. An example is the Iowa Students Loan and Liquidity. Nonprofits also compete in provision of education and housing services. The beneficiary benefits more from their competition. The nonprofit organizations in this model are reliable because they have provided housing and education services when needed. An example is the Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership. It has provided more services in relation to providing housing and education services. The nonprofit organization has a wider funding base because get their funds from smaller administrative fees, corporations and foundations.
References
Hall, M. R. (2002). Building on Relationships: A Fundraising Approach for Community Colleges . Community College Journal of Research &Practice.
Tindall, N. T, & Waters, R. D. (2010). The Relationship between Fundraising Practice and Job Satisfaction at Historically Black Colleges and Universities . International Journal of Educational Advancement.
