In view of the article, B.R. Ambedkar employs words outstandingly to influence and convince the readers. The following analysis focuses on the way the author combines various elements to inform his audience.
To start with, the author uses ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the readers. Mainly, ethos is simply using an appropriate language that the audience can relate with. Immediately when the article opens, the author poses some rhetorical questions, which is meant to get the audience thinking on the issue regarding breaking the Caste. He questions the way the Caste will breakup, if people are not free to consider whether it accords with reason. Notably, the author uses neutral and unbiased language, which is all-inclusive. The target audience is the Hindus, and the topic under scrutiny is how to break the Caste among them. To convince the readers that breaking the Caste is near impossible, the author states that ‘it would take ages before a breach is made.’ By so doing, the author invokes a pathetic appeal, which is meant to enable the reader to gain approval and acceptance of the idea stated.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Logical appeal is evident in the article. The author uses credible, reliable, and well thought out facts and evidence to support his assertions. For instance, when he mentions about destruction of Religion, he asserts that a section of his readers might find the idea revolting. Therefore, he embarks on explaining his point. By so doing, the author us simply applying inductive reasoning, as he adds some logical pieces to make his point clearer to the readers. In the same vein, by embarking differentiating between rules and principles, the author manages to outline facts, making it easier for the audience to comprehend his argument. In addition, logical appeal is equally evident in the assertion by the author that ‘a religious act may not be a correct act, but must at least be a responsible act’. In view of the foregoing quotation, it becomes clear that, the article has employed deductive reasoning to arrive to such a conclusion.
For any piece of literary work to achieve its intended purpose, it has to connect with the emotion of the target audience. This piece of reading does so superbly. The author begins by influencing the readers’ thinking in the issue of breaking up the Caste. He proceeds to mention that, for such a thing to happen, one has to do away with morality. In other words, the reader has to be ready to destroy the Shrutis and the Smritis. He mentions it is the only way out. The foregoing argument engages the audience emotionally. It evokes agreeable and equally inquisitive feelings regarding the way the author intends to destroy religion. By so doing, the author manages to keep the audience interested in his message.
In overall, the message of Caste breaking would not have been relayed appropriately, without applying literary elements that would appeal to the readers. Notably, appropriate language is evident in the article, considering the article is not provocative and biased. In the same vein, logical appeals have been applied effectively through laying out facts, and engaging deductive and inductive reasoning. Finally, the article evokes the feelings of the target audience through rhetorical questions, which influences their thinking and interested towards the topic under scrutiny.
