Part 1
A review of the first section in the article, The CSI effect defined, suggests that indeed the authors seek to provide their readers with what can be termed as their opinion concerning this phenomenon. The authors make use of an evidence-based approach in trying to support their definition, as well as the expansion of the description. Correctly, the authors have used four sources, cited throughout the section with the intention being towards ensuring that they can provide evidence to support their definition.
An evaluation of the section in which the authors engage in a discussion focusing on lawyers, police officers, judges, and community members, it can be noted that they avoid providing their opinion. Instead, the authors make use of relevant evidence to help in discussing the CSI effect from each of these perspectives. It can be noted that the authors cite a high number of sources; suggesting that they only seek to use evidence rather than opinion.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The results from the study by Shelton et al. suggests that exposure to CSI-type shows tends to create a high expectation for evidence, which, in most cases, may not be possible to present when dealing with a real-life situation. However, the results by Kim, Barak, and Shelton suggest that exposure to such shows does not have any effect on evidence expectations. Results from the study by Baskin and Sommers differ from others, as the study noted that there was a direct relation of the number of hours spent watching CSI-type shows and willingness to convict regardless of the absence of evidence.
From my analysis of the article, I have learned that it is always essential to synthesize sources as a way of trying to understand an issue from multiple perspectives before concluding. Incorporating various sources of information is necessary towards ensuring that the conclusion reached in a study is both accurate and reliable. Regarding the CSI effect, the article provided me with the understanding that exposure to CSI-type shows is shifting expectations among stakeholders in the criminal justice system, creating an unreliable hope for evidence.
Part 2
The thesis statement for this paper is, “The challenges presented in eldercare today present a much more viable platform through which to adopt reforms that are directed towards minimizing the challenges that the country is facing in its approach to providing quality care for the elderly population.”
The first improvement that can be made in this draft is that the author may seek to increase the use of sources to support the different positions that have been presented as part of the paper. The use of evidence is essential towards maximizing on the best outcomes in the presentation of a study. The second improvement is that the author may need to find sources that present multiple perspectives of the issue at hand with the aim being towards providing a sense of justification for the information offered. The third improvement would be the provision of a platform through which to synthesize the sources without having to rely so much on the information that is being provided.
The main cultural factors affecting the care of Elders in China are perceptions of health, illness, and death, as well as approaches to health promotion. The factors have been discussed in the studies by Gui & Koropeckyj-Cox and Gustafson & Huang.
The draft, as has been presented, does not show any limitations that are likely to affect its effectiveness.
From reading this article, I have learned that the synthesis of sources is often undertaken through an in-depth consideration of how the information is being presented within the different sources. The expectation is that this will aid towards creating a much more effective outcome in ensuring that the author makes viable conclusions using the information in the references.
