The outcomes of the actions in utilitarianism must affect society positively. According to Benlahcene et al. (2018), utilitarianism hopes to achieve goodness in the world based on the rational point of view. Utilitarianism aims to change people's actions by applying consequences to their outcomes. Tyler's (2006) views align with the consequences characteristics of utilitarianism as people are likely to face sanctions if they do not adhere to the rules of the organization.
Tyler’s views align with the utilitarianism approach in which they hope to curtail the self-interest of their employees to achieve the organizational goals that are meant for a wider group of individuals as well as the society (Tyler, 2006). Utilitarianism is based on rational thoughts, which align with Tyler’s sensible actions of obtaining compliance through acts such as sanctions in the pursuit of the utility or the happiness of the organization that comes with meeting their set objectives.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Deontology focuses on the actions nature together with their motives in determining whether they are wrong or right (Benlahcene et al., 2018). In deontological ethics, consequences on the actions do not matter in the decision of what is good or bad. However, actions tend to be intrinsically morally wrong or right. Therefore, actions by their nature have a moral character.
Deontology also develops judgment towards people based on their moral rights. According to Benlahcene et al. (2018), people are treated in ways that guarantee respect, dignity, and independence. Tyler's (2006) views of sanctions do not align with deontology whose actions on their own have a moral character. Tyler (2006) also denies people independence on their operations, as they have to follow certain goals that the organizations ought to achieve.
Batson (2006) works towards obtaining a combination of prosocial motives that harmonizes producing positive effects that exceed the impacts of a single prosocial motivation in the business operations. Batson's views align with the consequential characteristic of the utilitarianism theory (Benlahcene et al., 2018). Batson aims to eradicate the individual motives in their actions to achieve better results hence aligning with utilitarianism's consequences to the outcome characteristics.
Batson’s (2006) views are different from the deontology theory, as they emphasize on the consequences of the actions, which is achieving better results exceeding a single motive effect. Batson (2006) aims to change people's motives to achieve better outcomes, thus depicting a case whereby people are not entirely independent, different from the deontology theory.
References
Batson C. D. (2006). Orchestrating prosocial motives. D. L. Rhode (Ed.). Moral leadership: The theory and practice of power, judgment, and policy. (197), San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Benlahcene, A., Zainuddin, R., Syakiran, N., & Ismael, A. (2018). A Narrative Review Of Ethics Theories: Teleological &Deontological Ethics. A Narrative Review Of Ethics Theories: Teleological &Deontological Ethics , 23 , 31-38. Retrieved 15 September 2020, from.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Self-sacrifice and Self-interest: Do ethical values shape behavior in an organizational setting. D. L. Rhode (Ed.). Moral Leadership: The Theory and Practice of Power, Judgement, and Policy. (213), San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
