The article Defining Argumentation and Decision-making provides a framework that can mediate the role of social and personal judgment to realize relevant decision-making. The premise of argumentation plays a critical role in making relevant decisions.
The article introduces the domain of argumentation and critical decision-making. Based on the analysis, the suitable discussion question is; what are elements of argumentation and decision-making? In argumentation, the key elements that one has to focus on is adherence. The component of argumentation is associated with the need for an individual to be audience-centered ( Rieke et al. 1997) . One should focus on the arguments which are appropriate for the decision-making process. In the making of a claim, one has to consider the suggestion offered for others to adhere. One should also offer support to help others either subscribe to one's claims or intersect the discussion. From a decision-making perspective, the principle of working with uncertain knowledge is necessary. To achieve desired critical decision-making, one has to keep one mind open to alternatives and avoid temptations ( Rieke et al. 1997) . Critical thinking is characterized by being reflective, open-minded, and ready to apply alternatives to choices. Appropriate decisions are achieved through the use of rhetoric and dialectic methods.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The concept of argumentation and critical decision-making can be applied to current events globally, notably curbing the spread of the coronavirus. By applying the concept of argumentation, one should rely on the principle of adherence to avoid infection. Adherence concerning the pandemic involves following the provided guidelines from health departments on how to prevent further infections. An individual needs to focus on the arguments about the nature of the disease, its spread, and prevention. The knowledge will provide one with how to make critical decisions about preventing infections or causing infections. The framework can be achieved through critical analysis on the consequences of the disease and being open-minded in developing the choices that can prevent infections from escalating.
Reference
Rieke, R. D., Sillars, M. O., & Peterson, T. R. (1997). Argumentation and critical decision making . New York: Longman.
