The compelling points are supporting the maintenance of the faculty tenure process.
a) Ability to access grants for finance
b) Recognition and access to scholarships by the faculty
c) Teaching excellence in the respective colleges.
d) Favorable principles on academic freedom
The compelling points that favor abolishing or restructuring the faculty tenure process
a) Program discontinuation
b) Poor administration
c) Financial challenges for advancement.
d) Failure to attain professional responsibilities by the faculty members.
Restructuring the tenure process
I prefer to favor keeping the tenure process and restructure it. Tenure helps in protecting professionals in their work in the areas where there may be controversial or argumentative barriers. However, the most appropriate way of reconstructing the tenure process is cutting off the entire tenure and replacing it with other professional faculties that support professional excellence in programmatic innovation.
There are critics on the tenure on the advancement of higher education where people propose that tenure should be abolished and other systems installed to favor the education system. According to Richard Chait (1989) “Abolition of tenure would, on the whole, improve the quality of American higher education.” Professionals and other scholars say that tenure processes limit the chances of creating new reliable programs that reveal the professionalism of people who are willing to work and undertake professional courses. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1996 states that “tenure is an outmoded concept.”
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In the current professional qualifications, most areas to take consideration such as race, gender, ethnicity, and religion involve risky research by the scholars. This risky research proves that some invention has been carried out and the results are more useful than using the tenure process. Similarly, the day to day researches carried out help in measuring the level of professional autonomy and the quality of education of the researchers. The tenure process, therefore, has many little efforts in approving the level of academic integrity of the individuals who claim to be professionals.
Deciding those who are best qualified for receiving tenure
In determining the merit for those eligible for receiving tenure, there are academic standards that are required in supporting the institution. Therefore, the individuals legible for receiving tenure must have an outstanding academic performance and exhibit high interests in serving the institution they represent. In deciding the individuals who are eligible for being awarded tenure, some professional targets must have been attained. With effect to granting tenure, the individuals must achieve the following requirements:
1) The individuals must be compatible in performance and have an interest in working for the objectives of that faculty.
2) The individuals must have outstanding professional service in different faculties.
3) The individuals must be creative in research and high academic achievement.
4) There must be professional development projects which prove the growth of the faculty.
5) Individuals must exhibit teaching superiority.
However, the qualifications for tenure depend significantly on the respective institution that the professionals work from. Different institutions have different ways of operation and thus the varied styles of measuring the strengths of their members. According to the set objectives of the institution, the performance of individuals concerning the guidelines and documentation of the institution is considered in promotion and awarding tenure to the members. Therefore, the merit for deciding those who should be granted tenure mostly relies on the performance levels in the academic quality.
Generally, awarding tenure is a process that should be keenly looked into to ensure that those who are selected are professionals in the fields they are chosen to work on. Awarding tenure to professionals provides that the research projects carried out for the respective institutions are perfect and not prone to either deceit or forgery.
Reference
Caplow, T., & McGee, R. J. (1958). The Academic Marketplace. New York: Basic Books.
