It is a collective and general viewpoint that school resources clench positive impacts on the achievement of students. However, old and contemporary assessments suggest very little resources are meant to make ultimate significance in the endorsement and development of education. The crucial and central topic of discussion in this discourse is the class size. Quite a considerable number of studies have investigated the impact of class size on the performance and achievement of students. The vast majority of these studies have inclined and put more emphasis on elementary schools as well as pre-school impacts of class size on the performance of students. The predictable wisdom in the midst of the administration, teachers, and legislators is that classes with small capacity or rather a small number of students, render students to perform well and attain prowess in their academic endeavors. Nonetheless, this predictable and unadventurous wisdom has not been globally backed up by empirical substantiation. It’s clear that there are a number of research and studies that refute the aforementioned notion. Nevertheless, that does not dismiss the real fact of the effect that class size has on the achievement of students (Almulla, 2015). This research paper seeks to assess and analyze the impact of class size with a strong emphasis of what the administration should have in mind so that it can confidently address the issue and make a positive impact on the idea.
In elementary schools, small classes mainly imply that students are below 20 in number. In high school, the classes are usually slightly larger. There are equivalent variations in what is termed as large and small classes in colleges and tertiary institutions. More so to the obscurity of what constitute small classes. Researchers and scholars have incorporated quite a variety of distinct strategies for defining the size of a class. It could imply that the total number of students registered on a given course or even the number of students completing the same course. Additionally, there is an adjusting linkage between the size of the class and the services provided by the administration (Harfitt & Tsui, 2015). Reducing the size of a class could ease the administration services that are directed to the students.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Generally research exhibits that students in small and medium sized classes perform better in all academic areas than students in large classes. Students in small classes tend to be ahead with one or two topics and in the knowledge of content that is being administered as prescribed by the syllabus. They also score very high marks on standardized assessments. It is of great importance to note that quite a good number of studies analyze student examination and assessment marks with regard to the general aggregates of the entire class performance. The positivity that comes with small classes is important especially in elementary schools and those positive aspects translate to be more rigid and supreme with the increase in duration of a class stay and in the entire endeavors of a student (Tablante & Fiske, 2015). This simply implies that students who find themselves in smaller classes in the elementary stage still move with the same benefits to upper and middle schools even if they are transferred to larger classes.
When all is said and done, students’ performance remains as a critical and importance aspect. nonetheless, it is not only the one thing that dictates the achievement and success of students. When it comes to student engagement, research has consistently indicated that students interact more in small sized classes. They are much more likely to establish a friendly relationship with their colleagues and the teacher as well. It is not a new thing to see reports tabled by students in which they find it simple and easy to relate and work well in small classes compared to their colleagues in large classes. They use every opportunity that is at their disposal and they are very much positive about their academic excellence. Research puts it clear that small classes can allow and enable students to grow and develop extensive potentials and abilities of adapting intellectual and academic upheavals
It has not taken long since the discourse of class size took root and became an area of interest within the context of international keenness. Despite the fact that school leaders and administrators were arguing mainly on the benefits and advantages of small classes in the basic and elementary education, the concern deserves attention in tertiary institutions as well. With the high increase of online classes, and with the intensive upsurge on the size of classes in quite a considerable number of academic institutions that have been hit by budget reassess, it is of value and importance to question the issue of class size, does it really matter in institutions of higher learning? . Do the learning goals, teaching techniques, and workload anticipations range, with regard to class size? Is the motivation, learning, and work routine of students in large classes the same as those in small sized classes?
Past findings on the impacts of class size on student achievement in tertiary institutions are ambivalent. While some have found no effect, others have discovered that there is a decline in performance as the class capacity goes up. Nonetheless, studies of this type antedate the extensive growth of online classes that have high student registrations. Medium classes indicate little or no benefit over voluminous classes. This is with regard to undergraduate education and performance in mathematics. Nonetheless, engagement of students in smaller classes is more rigid. Putting distance learning into consideration, class size is a trivial concern in comparison to the reason for submitting to the course and the status of a given class.
It’s quite clear from the Analysis of IDEA center that class size matters. IDEA is a nonprofit making agency which is moved and commissioned to serve the best interest of students in colleges and universities. The agency has an archived database for student assessments that offers a chance to reconnoiter the impacts of class size on department and students viewpoint on learning and instructions. The information contained in the IDEA database constitutes undergraduate and postgraduate across the continental regions of the US.
From the assessment of the Information offered by IDEA, the first issue that is undeniable is that the goals and objectives instructors choose to focus on, range with regard to the class size. Instructors in extra-large classes have a very high probability of focusing on the teaching of factual knowledge other than the development of communication skills than those in small and medium sized classes. As it is usual and normal to the expectations of many, the basic approach to the provisions of instructions also varies. The basic reasons why instructors in large classes focus on factual knowledge is because they depend on lecture as the chief and main technique to providing instructions. Instructors in extra-large classes have a high probability of providing lectures than those in small and medium sized classes (Dickey, 2015).
The teaching methods which are used also vary. As that goes by, there is high anticipation and probability of instructors in small and medium sized classes to encompass student in hands on tasks and actual activities. Furthermore, they are more likely to facilitate learning as well as induce cooperation among students. Probably, the most issue that raises a lot of concern is that students in extra-large classes report that the instructor has a less likelihood of motivating them towards the attainment of goals that are also challenging on their part. The basic reason of lack of motivation may be due to the difference in course features. Students in extra-large classes have less non-reading assignments compared to those in small and average classes. Additionally, they report a lower participation of instructors in their achievement. This simply tells us that the perception of students where large classes are concerned is quite rigorous.
On the other hand, students in small classes report a rigid and passionate desire to take courses that are more intense than those in large classes. Furthermore, they have intensive and sturdier work habits. As that is not enough, quite a significant number of instructors report that students in small classes are more enthusiastic and positive about learning. Such enthusiasm and positivity is interpreted in their academic relevance and progress. The benefits of small classes are mainly important in the development of creative capacities as well as communications skills. Similarly, for average classes, the benefit is virtually the same. The most trivial and small gaps in the progress and development of students between small and large classes are sandwiched in the acquaintance of factual knowledge as well as getting to learn the most basic principles and theories (ZHENG Ling, 2015).
Overview of small and large classes
The one thing that is seen as a disadvantage with small classes is the fact of cost. Smaller classes to schools imply that the school administration will incur additional costs which will be targeted towards the construction of smaller classes and the employment of additional teachers. Quite a considerable number of schools are scared of this since they don’t want to incur additional costs.
Large classrooms on the other hand are however somehow beneficial to the achievement of success for students. One seeming advantage is the fact of independence. They are lively and exciting. The fact that core lessons take longer to complete students learns to maximize their time and do work on their own. Moreover, students are self-motivated and they clench the attribute of autonomy which is a crucial aspect in the endeavors of life (Justman, 2016)
Disintegration has long been a disadvantage that is associated to large classes. It is sometimes troublesome and difficult to engage in discussions in large classes. This is simply because students feel discouraged because their voices cannot be heard and have no impact in those classes. They are also dismayed by the large groups, the reason being, they find it had to talk and be listened. This is a phenomenon that contributes towards their downfall. Lack of engagement attention and negativity towards the course can as well lead to disruptive behaviors.
Another pressing concern and issue that is prevalent in large classes is that teachers spend less time teaching. While time may be set to meet students out of the normal class and lessons, it is quite clear that students may not get what it is they were supposed to understand during a normal class context. This leads them to lag behind with workloads. Little time with students also implies that there are no chances of teachers to fashion and establish strong bonds with their students.
Strategies
Narrowing down to the concerned and relevant party responsible for classes sizes which in this case is the administration which is in conjunction to other educational leaders. It is without exception that they have a role to play towards ensuring a conducive environment for the success and achievement of students. Faced with the pressure of creating classes which are conducive and which tailor the needs of students, most of the school administrations have put careful consideration on finance. As that goes by, their chief and main function is to allow the best environment for learning activities. To achieve this, the following strategies ought to be endorsed.
Leaders and the administration at large need to have knowledge on the means of restructuring service delivery using the approaches that exploit human and fiscal resources for the most susceptible students in the school. Leaders and school administrators should prepare themselves well for budgets and for the requirements that are necessary in achieving the most basic learning needs. With this in mind, the prerequisites for smooth learning shall be met (Elsayed, 2017).
The other thing that ought to be clasped in the case of strategizing is the Knowledge beyond acquisition and putting more emphasis on the beliefs that motivate action. There is a great relationship between the practice of leadership and the act of making policies. The way school administrators’ discharge and exercise leadership on the reduction of the size of a class depends on the finance and resources attached to corporate social responsibility initiatives. This implies that school leaders ought to acquire a detailed knowledge on how they should handle their schools. They should also get knowledge of the school funding streams, endorse creativity to look and assess the future, establish policies, create staffing plans and ask for fiscal funding for reformed service delivery (CAO, 2017).
Lastly, of importance is the creation of policies that recognize the absurdities of school leadership. This implies that school leaders and administrators ought to work closely with teachers and listening keenly to the expertise and support that is required by teachers. Nonetheless, just like teachers, appropriate and actual leadership for class lessening also depends on the creation of regulated learning prospects that assist administrators to develop fresh and new skills that induce adjustments in the way they do things. Part of accomplishing this encompasses casting school level leadership for class lessening without confining in the dark but rather, endorsing the light. Regardless of the expenses and resources to be used, leaders and the school administration are mesmerized and they benefit a lot when their policies are acknowledged and put in the front line (Zhuravlev & Ryazanov, 2017).
Conclusion
When it comes to the achievement and success of students, the size of the class plays a critical part. Small classes are far much better and they are the most appropriate where academic endeavors are concerned. The size of a class is not only important in elementary schools but also to institutions of higher learning. While the notable disadvantage of small classes is only emphasized on cost, it is clear that the advantages are beneficial beyond reasonable doubts. These advantages trigger not only the academic success of students but also their general life undertakings. Large classes on the other hand have their advantages; nonetheless the advantages conveyed by large classes are common and not very much essential. With regard to the negative side of large classes, it is simple and clear that they are not the best and therefore leaders and administrators should reconsider this and take the necessary steps for class reduction. As that goes by, leaders and the administration are pleaded to strategize and embrace the following. Construct leadership skills that back Corporate Social Responsibilities, put more emphasis on the beliefs that motivate action, and craft policies that recognize the enigmas of school leadership. With this in hand, the issue of class size shall be fully resolved.
References
Almulla, M. (2015). An Investigation of Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effects of Class Size on Teaching. International Education Studies , 8 (12), 33. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n12p33
CAO, Y. (2017). Assessing the Effect of Peer Learning in Large Interpreting Classes. Destech Transactions On Social Science, Education And Human Science , (meit). doi: 10.12783/dtssehs/meit2017/12872
Dickey, E. (2015). An Immersion Class In Ancient Education. Journal Of Classics Teaching , 16 (31), 38-40. doi: 10.1017/s2058631015000069
Elsayed, K. (2017). Large Size Class Teaching Strategies: An Overview. International Journal Of Business And Statistical Analysis , 4 (1), 39-44. doi: 10.12785/ijbsa/040103
Harfitt, G., & Tsui, A. (2015). An examination of class size reduction on teaching and learning processes: a theoretical perspective. British Educational Research Journal , 41 (5), 845-865. doi: 10.1002/berj.3165
Justman, M. (2016). Economic Research and Education Policy: Project Star and Class Size Reduction. SSRN Electronic Journal . doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2888198
Tablante, C., & Fiske, S. (2015). Teaching Social Class. Teaching Of Psychology , 42 (2), 184-190. doi: 10.1177/0098628315573148
ZHENG Ling. (2015). How to Improve Spoken English Teaching in College English Class. Sino-US English Teaching , 12 (11). doi: 10.17265/1539-8072/2015.11.005
Zhuravlev, Y., & Ryazanov, V. (2017). Solution of instance-based recognition problems with a large number of classes. Doklady Mathematics , 96 (2), 488-490. doi: 10.1134/s1064562417050271
