The film “Fed Up” overturns conventional wisdom concerning ways in which individuals gain wait and means of losing it. It uncovers the dirty secret that characterizes the food industry in America, revealing various reasons as to why individuals become sick from the products that they consume. In this case, “Fed Up” plays a critical role in fostering understanding concerning who is at fault that the kids depicted in the film failed to succeed in their weightless/health issues. Irrespective of the tremendous attention that the media directs toward food issue sin the American society, the public remains fascinated with food appearance rather than healthy, while the policies by the government by the policies to address childhood obesity in the country have failed. Parents of children do not take time to make sure that their children consume healthy foods, while they prefer buying as opposed to preparing healthy meals at home. Thus, the public can be considered as playing a role in hindering children from succeeding in their weightless/health issues. The government also contributes to the issues for failing to institute policies that can hinder marketing and selling of unhealthy food issues to children. Corporations making food are also to blame because they direct significant attention toward realizing profits rather than focusing on the health of the population (IMDB, 2014). In this perspective, therefore, the government, corporations, and parents of children are to blame for failure by kids in the film to succeed in their weightless/health issues.
The government plays a critical role in food/America’s diet. The major activities that the government undertakes pertaining to diet comprise of education, dissemination of information concerning nutrition, dietary guidance, instituting regulatory practices for regulating food, nutrition and health monitoring, legislation, and biomedical training and research. The government requires that the food sector respond to the government policies and activities to ensure that the market consumes healthy food. The government also offers guidance recommendations, which require moderation when it comes to dietary intake, prevalence of various food choices, and improved nutrition within the market. The government ensures that food companies comply with the dietary recommendations to minimize subjectivity to disease risk. Furthermore, the government embarks on nutrition monitoring, which allows it to measure the effectiveness of curbing dietary intake (Mozaffarian, Angell, Lang, & Rivera, 2018) . In addition, the government ensures to support nutrition, education, and health monitoring initiatives, which regulate diet in the society.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Even with the unexpected rise in chronic illnesses related to diet, the government has continued to support policies that continue stressing on the need for agricultural production of chief food commodities in line with supporting the food sector via conventional standpoints on economics food security, as well as trade. Even while under nutrition has witnessed significant improvements with the growth of government supported initiatives, including fortification programs and agricultural development, the government has also utilized educational policy initiatives, which it directs to individuals in order to respond to the growing cases of chronic illnesses. These measures are geared toward influencing the quality of diet by focusing on personal choice and responsibility via food labels, dietary guidelines, clinical counselling, and menu labelling. For instance, labelling at point of purchase and educating the population have received widespread usage. For these policies, they normally place significant responsibility on the part of the individual consumer, with which the industry feels more comfortable (Mozaffarian, Angell, Lang, & Rivera, 2018). The effectiveness of these kinds of approaches has promoted industry reformulations, which would have beneficial effects during the long run.
Regarding food regulations in America, the government should consider introducing fiscal incentives as well as disincentives that target producers, consumers, and retailers. Disincentives comprise of sales and exercise taxes on unhealthy material, including junk food and sugar-sweetened beverages, or eradication of industry wide tax benefits for manufacturing as well as marketing unhealthy products. The disincentives of key products might be politically challenging. Nonetheless, the rising global tax expansion on beverages sweetened with sugar reveals that the approach has received acceptance. These kinds of taxes might be financially regressive in the event of individuals with low income, although progressive due to benefits they would bring to health and nutrition. To assist in minimizing financial regression among the low-income individuals while at the same time boosting health effects, tax revenues can facilitate in instituting other strategies for promoting health, such as manufacturing, retail, and agricultural incentives, which would lead to a reduction in healthy food product prices (Mozaffarian, Angell, Lang, & Rivera, 2018) . As opposed to being punitive, the economic disincentives as well as incentives would play an essential role in normalizing the market by ensuring that prices of distinct foods come closer to the real societal costs, which would facilitate in improving the overall health of the public.
Moreover, regulations should prevail that target making sure that quality and procurement standards remain sustainable, while the government would not incur huge costs in deploying them. For example, standards or limitations on sodium as well as trans-fat prevail in numerous countries, while similar standards should prevail for added and free sugars. Since the government is the major foo buyer, standards on nutrition procurement should exist for all food purchases across programs and agencies. Furthermore, national and local standards of quality need implementing regarding industry’s utilization of food additives. In addition, the government can focus on promoting the shift of the food industry toward healthier foods, while leveraging on the growing demand among consumers. Additionally, tax incentives together with various fiscal policies should focus on promoting research initiatives in line with healthier foods manufacture as well as marketing within the industry. These should be combined with fiscal disincentives for promoting and marketing junk food and beverages sweetened with sugar (Mozaffarian, Angell, Lang, & Rivera, 2018) . These measures would play an essential role in improving the overall food sector in America.
References
IMDB. (2014). Fed Up. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2381335/
Mozaffarian, D., Angell, S. Y., Lang, T., & Rivera, J. A. (2018). Role of government policy in nutrition—barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating. Retrieved from https://www.bmj.com/content/361/bmj.k2426
