Within the culture, engagement with the material commodities often implies the shallowness and the quest for wealth that is generally regarded as not being compatible or also not easy to have reconciliation with moral convictions. In the case of the Beowulf, the Swedes and Geats wholesome reverence towards treasure has no representation as a moral weakness or a shortcoming (Bestilleiro Álvarez, 2016) . For sure, the poem makes typically use of treasure as a representation of the people of the Scandinavia ever loved values of the culture.
Heroes, influential personalities and kings in Beowulf need to have a continuous establishment with their dignities or reputations but include those that have proceeded with inheriting and earning. Characters achieve the former through serving as reminders to the audience of the renowned ancestors and the latter through the collection of treasurers. The lavish rewards where Beowulf gets from Hrothgar serves as a testimony to the valour and prowess of the Geatish warrior, the same way the majestic Heorot implies the power of Hrothgar. At some juncture, the peculiar object is efficient in gaining the respect that a man deserves irrespective of having acquired it via mighty deeds. Meanwhile, treasure loss also implies the power decline (III, R., & Gilmartin, 2019). Following the death of Beowulf, the poet announces the conclusion of the era of the Geatish. In this case, he observes that no follower will be in a position to put on treasure Beowulf victories present in the dragon within his memory the same way a beautiful woman will have no chance of linking it with torque on her neck. Treasure serves as a symbol of the stability and prosperity; lack of these attributes infers that the clan of the Geatish will not be in a position of being seen in the finery and the jewels.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Finally, Beowulf also makes of treasure in solidifying the most valuable bonds; those where their respective followers plus other sects from other nations. Every king has a responsibility of giving to his more committed thanes the riches; a task shown by the ever application of the royal epithets like the ‘ring provider,' ‘gift-lord' plus the ‘gold friendly keepers' (Workman, 2005) . The action not only serves a customs matter but the same as the same as an honor. Part of his sons, the wicked Heremond is believed to be offering no rings or honoring Danes. Within this culture, treasure does not hoard but also circulate invaluable social manners. On a global perspective, kings make use of treasure in strengthening the alliances and the avoidance of the conflict among various tribes of the Scandinavian. Tribes that are friendly to each other may engage in the exchange of gifts while those are that are ever hostile to each other may proceed with the pacification of each other with either gold or through payment with the blood-based tributes (Workman, 2005) . Based on this plan, women serve as representatives of the more valuable token associated with the exchange, while kings usually proceed with the betrothing their daughters with the rulers from the foreign lands for gain political wise. The ever mentioning of the jewels and gold that are adorning the Wealtheow suggests her value politically. For instance, the queen is seen wearing treasure, and in a sense, she is a treasure herself.
References
Bestilleiro Álvarez, L. (2016). The Study of Kennings in the Anglo-Saxon epic poem Beowulf.
III, R., & Gilmartin, E. (2019). Approaching the Treasure-Seat: An Analysis of the Role of Kings in " Beowulf" Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/31038496/Approaching_the_Treasure-Seat_An_Analysis_of_the_Role_of_Kings_in_Beowulf_
Workman, B. (2005). Treasuring identity: subject-object relations in Beowulf. Retrieved from https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1280&context=honors-theses
