Websites or other references used:
a. Muhashamsani, A. G. (2015). The relationship between pay satisfaction, leadership styles, and intention to leave among local empoyees at Yamaha Electronics Manufacturing (M) Sdn. Bhd (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia).
b. Bruni, E., Cortellazzo, L., Bonesso, S., & Gerli, F. (2018). Leadership Styles Scale: Conceptualization and Initial Validation.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A summary of what you learned on any web site(s) you reviewed (3 points).
There exists no single way of defining leadership or leadership styles. Different persons whether natural or legal have different needs and environments and therefore they require different methods of management. A proper comprehension of these leadership styles and what is most suitable for a particular environment is necessary for determining what leadership style would work effectively for a particular group of people or the environment. This paper will briefly address different types of leadership including autocratic leadership, democratic leadership and laissez-faire leadership.
Also, the summary of what I have learnt is as follows. Autocratic leadership is mainly associated with complete control and militant structures. In this style of leadership, all orders flow from the leader and his or her subject barely have any opinion to counter the leader’s orders or question any instructions from above. On Democratic Leadership, the father of democracy, Abraham Lincoln defined it as a government of the people, by the people and for the people themselves. This could be summed up as interactive leadership where the voice of all the players is central in deciding how the affairs of a particular organizational set up are run. It is more of a participatory style of leadership. On laissez-faire leadership, it is the radical opposite of autocracy. This is a leadership style that advocates for a system where subjects act as they wish. In economic terms, it is a doctrine that advocates for non-interference by government or authorities in general in the private affairs of their subjects
What you like/think is interesting and useful in the summarized information, and MOST IMPORTANT: WHY? (3 points)
The useful things I gathered out of the styles above are that, often times, in the case of autocratic leadership, the leader is barely liked by his subjects. This leadership technique can be useful in an industrial production based environment where the output quantity is what determines performance. With maximum output attained, then there’s a guarantee of more sales which are likely to translate into profits. It is also effective in the military. Democratic leadership as a style has also proved to be useful for so many business models except in cases of stockbrokers. Democratic leadership has also proved effective in a number of countries such as the United States of America (Muhashamsani, 2015). Laissez Faire as a leadership approach works best in work environments with self-motivated individuals and in creative environments too where it has proved to be useful in terms of sparking up innovation.
What limitations or other critical analysis do you see in the references/information you reviewed, and MOST IMPORTANT: WHY? (4 points)
In examining the limitations, I gathered the following. A key limitation of autocracy as a leadership style is that in organizations where social interaction and employee motivation are central to the organization’s success, then this style may not be effective. The greatest limitation however associated with democratic leadership is that it lengthens the decision-making process hence a perfect democracy may not be suitable in a fast-paced environment. With regard to Laisse Faire, the greatest limitation is that it may otherwise prove futile in organizational setups that require structure and order (Bruni et al., 2018).
The leadership styles explained above highlighted alongside with ways in which they can be useful and their limitations and why it is the case. It is my personal summary that no one leadership style absolutely works effectively to deliver on its own. In most cases, a combination of one or more styles has proved to be more fruitful and effective as opposed to using one particular style all through.
