In most states, there is an unwritten warranty that is subject to protect the residential property in a manner that it provides a conducive environment for habitation. The landlord is responsible for the implied warranty of habitat. Also, the landlord must ensure that the accommodation issued out meets the standards of most building codes. In addition, the landlord should abide by the responsibility of duties such as repair and maintenance related to the leased property if necessary. The article will focus on constructive eviction and implied warranty of habitability to explore and resolve the case of Steve and Billy.
Considering the scenario that occurred between Billy and Steve, on the grounds that Steve had informed Billy on several occasions about the situation of the broken step in the staircase of the building, it reveals a state of insecurity, and thus it is unsafe for human habitation. The theme of negligence is depicted in this case since Billy ignores to respond to his duty as an innkeeper to repair the broken stair to ensure the safety of tenants.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The Causes of Action That Steve Has
Steve should report the situation to a local building inspector since the implied law of warranty states that if a landlord fails to respond to the arising issues, the tenant has the right to report the situation to the authorities. Another form of action that Steve can engage in is to break the lease. The approach of breaking the contract is often initiated if the local building inspector is not able to handle the case as per that time. If Steve can prove a breach of implied warranty of habitability, then he has the right to break the lease and vacate from the premises before the termination dates.
Steve can also sue Billy in a civil lawsuit. This will ensure that Billy can cater for the medical charges and services for Steve injured leg. At the court, Steve will be required to provide appropriate evidence based on the situation that occurred. The proof should entail credible documents involving the records of the events and attachment of explicit photos. This will help in supporting the case.
The Remedies for the Faulty Heater
The remedy that Steve has for the faulty heater is to take part in withholding the rent. In line with the implied law of habitability, if a landlord ignores to carry out the responsibilities of repairing a necessary fault relating to habitation, then the tenant can withhold rent to pay for the crucial repair issue. For instance, in some countries, the tenant should write a request to the landlord and wait for a certain number of days for feedback. If the landlord fails to respond in the required time, then the tenant has the right to use the rental fee to do the repairs, provided that the tenant issues the landlord with a receipt of evidence.
In conclusion, it is recommended that all the tenants deal with their habitability issues, with the help of a professional in habitation issues, and also provide relevant records like the receipts and clear photos of the events. On the other hand, if a landlord engages in attempts to evict a tenant for the purposes of failing to pay the rent fee under breach of habitability or in either way making less payments after taking care of the repairs, then the tenant should reach an attorney for consultation.
