The primary difference between a republic and democracy is in the parameters that the law places on the government, which affects the rights of the minority. Both kinds of government usually use a representative system that is, citizens, who vote for politicians to stand in for their interests and create the government (Roust and Shvetsova, 2007). Within a republic, a charter of rights or a constitution protects particular inalienable rights, which the government cannot take away, even if the majority of voters have elected the government. However, within a "pure democracy," the majority can impose the will of the minority (Roust and Shvetsova, 2007).
Most of the modern states are democratic nations with a constitution that a popularly elected government can amend. Therefore, the requirement to the democratic process is, of course, only a necessary, not a sufficient condition for the federal success (Roust and Shvetsova, 2007). Roust, and Shvetsova (2007) argue that just the nations with a well-developed (well institutionalized) democratic elective competition possess the opportunity to create a resilient national union and support their federal representative organizations not only in form but their political system as well.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
These concepts influence contemporary democratic governance in that, for citizens to view the constitution as a ‘‘good deal,’’ it is not acceptable that particular individuals prefer its union arrangements. There are numerous alternatives that political actors can relate any given federal constitution. For instance, where the constitutional terms are altered slightly, some might gain, while others would lose. Therefore, the amended arrangement could remain favored to the no-union repeal point. People might propose an amendment to an existing constitution adaptation. In fact, numerous modifications can reflect the diverse preferences of the organization members.
Reference
Roust, K., and Shvetsova, O. (2007). Representative Democracy as a Necessary Condition for the Survival of a Federal Constitution
