It is inappropriate for US government to ban rules that allow every individual to have a gun for personal protection. The second Amendment law is against any form of infringement with people who bear arms for protection (SPITZER, 2017) . Firearms enable vulnerable individuals especially women to protect themselves from acts of violence like rape.
Guns are useful, and they do not kill people on its own. It is people with the gun who decides to pull the trigger, and they only do so when needs arise. Guns make the world a more peaceful place they help users defend themselves from robbery and domestic violence (Wolfson, Teret, Azrael, & Miller, 2017) . It is appealing that the second amendment regulates the possession of a gun by bad persons or mentally challenged personnel, this ensures that safety is a guarantee to everyone.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Guns provide protection for the household. If an innocent person is grabbed on the street or attacked in the house, that individual would want the opportunity to be able to defend himself or herself from the possibility of serious injuries (FARRIS, 2017) . Taking away the rights of owning the gun is incongruous because most of the people who intends to use the weapon to harm others are acquiring the guns illegally.
Besides weapons being used in military sections, the new policy approves the use of guns for personal self-defense. Initially, states use to term the possession of guns as “threatening to use weapons angrily” (Stephen P. Teret & Webster, 1998) . In today’s generation, weapons are necessary in the case of unexpected criminal attack. Having guns eliminates the phobia of fear along the streets in the major cities and ensures that safety is enacted in a highly unsecured place.
Arm possession offers both public and psychological health benefits. When perpetrators in the major cities like Colorado, Newtown, and Connecticut were psychologically ill, they used lethal means to cause harm and deaths to the innocent (Ablow, 2013) . Advocating the possession of guns could have protected many individuals from such brutality in the streets. Giving the citizens the right to bear arms makes them confident and competent without having to rely on unassailable government.
A disarmed population has no control over the federal authorities or state. Since the authorities arrives hours later after the crime incidence, Children have to rely more on their parents for protection than the government. It is, therefore, more honorable for parents to have guns and defend their family than being a victim. It is also safer to keep guns in the house, occasionally people think that guns risk the lives of young children, but the reverse is true many children lose their lives in swimming pool accident than in gun shooting (Ablow, 2013) .
Imposing strict rules on gun controls create the highest rates of murder and assault in the nation. The notion that gun control prevents crime scene is not true because most gun crimes involve gangsters and not the local citizens. According to American statistics, men and women who are armed have managed to prevent almost two million offenses in a year.
For the security of every individual, it is vital if US government stops enforcing gun control laws. The government should put the needs of every law-abiding citizen before anything else and give full support to the second amendment law that allows the possession of guns purposefully for protection.
References
Ablow, D. K. (2013). The psychological and public health benefits of gun ownership. Fox News . Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/12/psychological-and-public-health-benefits-gun-ownership.html
FARRIS, J. (2017). THE RIGHT OF NON-CITIZENS TO BEAR ARMS: UNDERSTANDING "THE PEOPLE" OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT. indiana Law Review, 50 (3), 943-967.
SPITZER, R. J. (2017). GUN LAW HISTORY IN THE UNITED STATES AND SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. 80 (2), 55-83.
Stephen P. Teret, J., & Webster, D. W. (1998). Support for New Policies to Regulate Firearms — Results of Two National Surveys. The New England Journal of Medicine . Retrieved from http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199809173391206#t=articleTop
Wolfson, J. A., Teret, S. P., Azrael, D., & Miller, M. (2017). US Public Opinion on Carrying Firearms in Public Places. American Journal Of Public Health , 929-937. Retrieved from doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303712
