Question 1
Kapadia explains that cultural appropriation occurs when members of a majority group adopt elements of a minority culture, such as food and clothing. It, consequently, disintegrates the former’s source of learning. She argues that in the contemporary world, filled with recipe sharing and pop diet media, no diet belongs to a particular ethnic group. She, therefore, believes that all foods can be shared and owned by all populations. I, however, disagree with her stance. It is mainly because various countries differ in terms of the food they consume. Some diet such as the sushi is well known that it is was invented from China. Similarly, pasta originated from Italy.
Question 2
Kapadia wholesomely rejects cultural appropriation by providing an example of her mother, a Jewish lady, who learned about the Indian recipes. Moreover, she describes that her lead recipe developer makes unique Mexican dishes learned in Los Angeles. She offers argumentative evidence, which is not convincing enough. The primary merit of using the rhetorical strategy is that it prompts her readers to investigate their personal experiences around the topic. In contrast, the approach may demonstrate some insensitivity to some individuals; for instance, some people from various cultures may take offense to her argument.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Question 3
Kapadia uses ethical appeals to provide credibility for her pieces of evidence. She, for instance, mentions that her mother is a qualified Indian chef, to validate her argument. Moreover, Kapadia indicates that Paul Harrison is the lead recipe developer. By citing personal examples, she offers strong opinions based on her observations. It is relevant to state that Harrison had “spoken the Spanish” to indicate that he had mastered the art of preparing Mexican dishes yet he was not Latino. Examples of hypothetical statements cited include, the best Chinese and Indian foods some people consumed were from outside China and India, respectively. These declarations are, however, not substantial as they are comparative and subjective.
