In a broad spectrum, the redrawing and redistricting politics dominated Texas State in the early 2000s when Tom DeLay sought to increase the Republicans power through gerrymandering of the State’s congressional Districts. The results of these efforts resulted to the increase of Republican representatives from 15 to 21 of the total 32 seats available (Toobin, 2006). The approval of the new changes was done even though a number of voting rights activists, minority groups and Democrats were against the manipulation of boundaries purposely aimed at influencing voting towards a particular direction.
From an in-depth analysis of the available literature on electoral politics in Texas, it is precisely evident that the State has engaged in gerrymandering politics with the goal of influencing congressional delegation. As a result, the endeavor caused a lot of uproar with major concerns raised on its effects on the protection of voting rights. Although various articles establish the meager reasoning behind Tom DeLay’s endeavor, it is apparently clear that partisan interests in the politics of boundaries significantly violets the rule of law ( The New York Times, 2006 ). One of the reason’s that leads to the questioning of the aspiration to change the congressional boundaries is based on the fact that the constitution requires redistricting after a period of ten years. However, the redrawing of the boundaries is captured in the constitution to ensure that population increase and populations are considered in order to ensure people from all spheres from the US are equally and fairly represented in the legislative processes.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
To be precisely clear, the attempt violated the principle of ‘one man one vote’, hence the justice system should have considered striking down the rationale behind the gerrymandering prospects by legislators. It is worth acknowledging that partisan electoral politics that seek to influence congressional demarcations may limit the mechanisms of democracy denying the voters their constitutional rights indirectly.
References
The New York Times. (2006). The Texas Gerrymander. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/01/opinion/the- texas-gerrymander.html
Toobin, J. (2006). Drawing the Line. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/03/06/drawing-the-line-3