Abstract
A person’s identity is unquestionably determined many factors ranging from the psychological, the historical, to the social. Correctly, different social aspects play a significant role in shaping an individual's identity. This study set out to investigate some of the social elements that influence the self-identity of a person. The outcome of the study reveals that different social factors like culture and family affect an individual’s entire life, including morals, behavior, responsibility, and many other aspects. For example, the collective perception of the Asians influences their collaborative nature, while the individualistic culture of the western countries defines their egocentric nature.
Introduction
A wide range of angles forms an individual’s identity. Family, culture, personal interests, friends, and surrounding environment are on the whole factors that will in general help shape an individual's personality. A few components may have a more considerable amount of an impact than others, and some might not have any effect whatsoever. As a person is coming of age in the family, they are affected by numerous parts of their life. Culture and family may impact an individual's sense of responsibility, morals, and ethics tastes in music, sports and humor, and numerous different parts of life. However, the paper will focus on the social environment shapes one’s identity.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Discussion
The social environment is a noteworthy impact on human behavior. In my contention, I trust support assumes a more significant role in our life. People in various cultures have different arrangements of norms ( Garbarino, 2015 ). We have standards which are measures for acknowledged and anticipated behavior. Norms endorse "appropriate" behavior. At the end of the day, what a great many people do, are what is typical. The decent variety of culture results in various sort of behaviors as a result of the multiple types of norms, however generally fundamentally the same as each other (Farrow et al. 2017).
For instance, the westerners embrace individualism which is the idea of giving one's objectives and characterizing one's identity as far as personal characteristics as opposed to group identification. Then again, the Asians practice collectivism which is offering need to the objectives of one's group (regularly one's more distant family or work team) and characterizing one's identity in like manner. Consequently, Asians are interdependent self which implies understanding one's character in connection to other people ( Garbarino, 2015 ). As I would like to think, nurture has a more grounded contention here because we realize that Asians are endeavoring to pursue the vices of the westerners as far as Asians as yet being conservative and the westerners are progressively liberal. As time pass, the more up to date ages in Asia are open-minded, and we can adjust to new circumstances and change our behavior towards people and things (Oyersman 2015) .
Everyone is different when it comes to their identity yet these personalities are activated when put in various sorts of circumstances. A few people like to think that nature impacts their life, yet I might want to contend with all due respect that, a few people were brought into the world gifted. However, Ivan Pavlov Russian psychologist, demonstrate that everything can be learned through conditioning which is gaining in where a stimulus gets the ability to bring out a reaction that was initially evoked by other stimuli ( Garbarino, 2015 ). In this manner, nurture is the crucial part of our lives supposing that we didn't have the social influence we would act like animals, depending on our innate instincts which are likely possibly to hunt animals when we are ravenous or seek an oasis when we are thirsty. One of the significant impacts is religion. Religion can indeed change an individual's reasoning and conduct, particularly cults (Oyersman 2015) .
In 1971, Zimbardo Philip experimented the Standford Prison. The investigation demonstrates how the intensity of social situation enables an individual to twist their identities. At the point when an induced role in an individual, can change an individual's conduct, it forces the individual to play the part of the social situation. Philip set up a mimicked jail at Stanford University with twenty-four participants from Canada and the United States of America. He isolated them into two gatherings which are the guards and the detainees (Farrow et al. 2017).
Philip needed to take note of the mental impacts of turning into a detainee or a guard. The participants embraced their roles genuinely snappy, and the examination must have ended sooner than anticipated. The outcomes demonstrate that the genetic characteristics are nothing contrasted with the nurtured qualities; however, we likewise need to put all factors into thought; situation, the environment, pressures, and methods (Oyersman 2015). Even though there may be more, these are the most critical ones. Concerning condition, the test is led in a replica of real jail. People’s perception of a prison is a “bad body" place in which individuals are denounced (Farrow et al. 2017). So as you venture into it, you will have a wrong impression. While the situation is the detainees and guards roles are, where the detainees are required to act with terrible conduct due to the standards in each culture. The guards in detainment facilities are expected to behave in a better manner compared to the detainees at whatever cost (Oyserman 2015).
These norms are depicted a great deal particularly in films, so it is just average to adjust to these characters. Some pressures in the social world, and because detainees are insubordinate, being bolted up is not a decent thing. Indeed, even animal hate to be locked up. Would you be able to envision the psychological torment? It resembles when you were as yet fifteen years of age and your folks grounded you at home for one year. Then again, your house is more agreeable than jail or a confine (Farrow et al. 2017).
Conclusion
Lastly, regardless I endorse the nurture side of this discussion nature versus nurture banter given that I trust I have provided a hypothesis and examinations or precedents that can bolster my nurture banter. Toward the end, the social condition is a noteworthy impact on human conduct. Given a specific social situation to an individual, they will change their behavior or adjust in like manner to the circumstance. People are in charge of their personality, for them themselves engraved social patterns in their community. Society influences social norms. What's more, along these lines, most of the people that have a similar view will impact numerous others into their social pattern. Social impact is an excellent thing to change an individual which includes peer pressure and strain to adjust. This makes up into a culture yet culture encompasses numerous things; the food they take and maybe the garments they wear. Culture and norms are relative. By changing into a standard is to yield to the social culture. In this way, nurturing happens, yet nature overcomes.
References
Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics , 140 , 1-13.
Garbarino, J. (2017). Children and Families in the Social Environment: Modern Applications of Social Work . Routledge.
Oyserman, D. (2015). Identity ‐ based motivation. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource , 1-11.
Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Personal values in human life. Nature Human Behaviour , 1 (9), 630.
