According to David, music is a universal language since it does not recognize cultural and linguistic boundaries like other languages. And as much as many might agree, I think one must understand that each culture has its music. Various cultures identify with their type of music, and what they consider as music might vary from one culture to another. People from the African culture, for example, might have a problem associating with music from the Chinese culture.
Songs, however, can be received and decoded into complete opposites from the composer's intended meaning. An emotional song can be decoded into two different memories by different subjects. There is no way we will agree that the language has passed the same intended message to the two different subjects. A song such as "Hallelujah" has been sung to different audiences, for instance, in a wedding procession, and by mourners to remember their deceased spouses.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Our backgrounds culturally will always affect the way we interpret musical tropes. When addressing a group of people from different cultural backgrounds, we might unintentionally end up hurting others' feelings. We need to accept the fact that there is more to music than just the usual vibe. We need to learn how different cultures interpret certain aspects of music. Also, we need to put into consideration age groups and mental states of people and how these factors will affect how they interpret such music.
In summary, my opinion focuses on the fact that before we say music is a universal language, we should embrace other people’s individual music. This will help in strengthening the language of care for special persons such as the aged in residential homes or those under health care observation.
