According to Ramos, Erkanli & Koenig (2018) , the attitude of patients in response to a therapeutic program depends on the outcome. It is therefore important to allocate a productive therapy to ensure patient commitment. Similarly, patients are comfortable with a program that considers their assumptive world rather than theories. From the survey, religious patients receiving religious cognitive therapy proved most effective since these patients recorded a reduction in depression and a high improvement in social adjustments as compared to those patients in traditional cognitive behavior therapy.
Pastoral Counseling treatment (PCT) as well gives better results than cognitive behavior therapy, thus a religious treatment program has a better therapeutic effect. However, a religious program can blur specifications or differences in patient therapy results, which can well be identified by the use of cognitive behavior therapy. Therapists performed better in cognitive treatments in Religious Cognitive Therapy (RCT) situations than Non-Religious Cognitive Therapy (NRCT) situations. RCT under therapist treatment interactions ascertains that personal values of therapists and the value of the therapy method affect the outcome. This is elaborated in a research showing poor performance by a nonreligious cognitive therapy with nonreligious therapists. “The relationship between the patient and therapist similarity and improvement do not directly affect performance; for instance, great performance is recorded in outcomes involving RCT treatment with nonreligious therapists and NRCT treatment with religious therapists” ( Propst, Ostrom, Watkins, Dean &Mashburn, 1992 ).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In conclusion, both religion and traditional cognitive behavior therapy show preventive effects for the patients, in long-term measures. It is believed that the more religion is used on a person, the more they are easily convinced into giving into social behavior; however, therapy methods that actively targeted involved the religious beliefs of the clients were not as effective as the secular methods in increasing generosity (Pearce, Koenig, Robins, Daher, Shaw, Nelson & King, 2015) .
References
Pearce, M. J., Koenig, H. G., Robins, C. J., Daher, N., Shaw, S. F., Nelson, B., & ... King, M. B. (2015). Effects of religious versus conventional cognitive-behavioral therapy on generosity in major depression and chronic medical illness: A randomized clinical trial. Spirituality In Clinical Practice , 2 (3), 202-215.doi:10.1037/scp0000076
Propst, L. R., Ostrom, R., Watkins, P., Dean, T., &Mashburn, D. (1992).Comparative efficacy of religious and nonreligious cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of clinical depression in religious individuals. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology , 60 (1), 94-103.doi:10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.94
Ramos, K., Erkanli, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2018). Effects of religious versus conventional cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) on suicidal thoughts in major depression and chronic medical illness. Psychology Of Religion And Spirituality , 10 (1), 79-87.doi:10.1037/rel0000113
