There is the adage that goes ‘the apple never falls far from the tree.’ This truism elicits a complete fallacy, nonetheless, and beyond doubt, it can be proved that ‘the apple can fall far from the tree.’ The exact truism phrase denotes that a character trait can only be inherited from parents and those behaviors of a given child can only be traced back to the parents. Well, the stance against it holds to be factual. Possibly, a child can inherit patterns of characteristics, which are not part of the parent’s features.
Notably, it is possible for an apple to fall far away from the tree to mean that a child can acquire traits based on environmental constraints. It is based on the fact that natural and environmental factors have a fundamental impact on the manner in which a person grows. Even though biological factors, such as genes, play a significant role in child-parent inheritance, external things and interaction processes in real life provide behavioral means that a child may attain to survive.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
While giving credit to Charles Darwin’s survival for the fittest theory, the environment requirements can impact the behavior of a person. Such can occur in such a manner to trigger an individual to operate in the mode fitting a given scenario just for survival. Considering all these facts, it is possible for an apple to fall far away from the tree, and this proves why ‘a child may be a thief, while a parent is a pastor.’
On the whole, as far as the gene is a crucial factor in determining the behavior of a child, environmental factors have a more significant chance of modifying a person in a figure fit for survival in the given surrounding. It is undeniably survival for the fittest, and in reality, therefore, the environment may force a son or a daughter to deviate from those norms characteristic of a parent to adopt own peculiar features. In the final analysis, therefore, the apple can fall far away from the tree.
