On the analytic reasoning aspect, I identified that I usually make quick decisions on issues without carefully analyzing them. To be an analytic reasoned, I plan to make special efforts in thoughtfully analyzing issues before I make a conclusion. This will mean gaining the information I need before I arrive at my own conclusion. I also have the ability of recognizing arguments and gaining an understanding of their structure when I encounter them. I can make a recognition of arguments in different contexts, which provides me with a better understanding of them. I also identified that I am highly skilled at the construction of valid arguments with true reasons and logical conclusions. By paying attention to the different arguments I encountered, I was able to identify that for every argument I made, and I had valid reasons and the conclusions needed (DiSanto et al., 2017).
The construction of sound arguments is critical to ensure that you can efficiently explain and support the reasons that support your argument. Based on the tool, I was able to know that I was skilled at the construction of valid arguments with true reasons and logical conclusions. I plan to develop this skill further through the analysis of the key arguments that I listen to or read in various literary sources (Schorr, 2015). This is because I recognize that making sound arguments acts as the best channel for me to communicate my point to others. The last aspect of the evaluation tool was on the effective evaluation of arguments. I realized that I am not particularly skilled at the evaluation of arguments in terms of their validity and soundness. I plan to increase my ability to evaluate the arguments I hear on the basis of their logical soundness. This activity has shown me the importance of not only structuring my arguments in an effective way but also the proper analysis of the arguments I hear.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
DiSanto, R., & Adkins, K. (2017). The Challenge of Making Good Logical Arguments. Conversations on Jesuit Higher Education , 52 (1), 10.
Schorr, J. (2015, January). Nyāya’s logical model for ascertaining sound arguments. In Indian Conference on Logic and Its Applications (pp. 170-182). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
