Climate change is among the most debated and talked about issues in the contemporary times in the world. It has resulted in two great opposing sides that express their views relating to the philosophical aspects related to the subject. The main concern that has a led to the increase in addressing the subject of climate by the media as well as the general public relates to an intense increase in disasters and other catastrophic events that have impacted humanity negatively such as loss of life and destruction of property among other negative consequences. It has, hence, increased the fear in humanity existence as well as compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs without any difficulties. The intense debates have also led to increased studies and research on the subject to counter the opposing views and presentation as noted in the contemporary times that supports the reason and evidence given about the subject of climate change (Eubanks, 2015). Also, such evidence from research has also been used to convince the opposing sides views to win them and enable them to have a change regarding perspective about the subject of climate change. The evidence, thus, has also been used to determine the recommendations made by both the government and private sector regarding formulation of policies and laws that guide issue to environment management and conservation matters among other related concepts. Climate change concerns have also impacted the agricultural sector negatively that has increased food security concerns in the world as a result of changed weather patterns.
There is opposing and contrasting point of view related to the subject of climate change and global warming at large. Some have refuted the scientific evidence presented by scholars and researchers in the subject. Among the reasons that are presented to oppose the idea of climate change include failure of scientists or other persons doing the study to show the connection between a carbon dioxide and climate change. The proponents of this point argue that the carbon dioxide constitutes a minute part of the atmospheric components at only 0.035%. They, thus, state the component is minuscule and unlikely to cause the devastating impacts that scientist tries to presents as a cause and effects of climate change. They further state that water vapor is a strong component of the greenhouse gasses leading at 95% as well as methane among other gasses. They note that the perception created for humans to believe that carbon dioxide emitted by humans as the lead causes of climate change is thus a fallacy and, thus, needs to be challenged and countered as a reason. Secondly, they support the first point they present that relates to the quantity of carbon dioxide produced and note that the human contribution to the subject of carbon dioxide is very minimal. And, over 97% of the carbon dioxide in the earth come from the natural processes and nature and unlike the way it is stated that human contributes the greatest carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The proponents and supporters of the position present evidence from natural processes such as volcanic eruption, decaying of plants and leaves, other animals domesticated as well as wild and microorganisms among others. They note that the equatorial Pacific Ocean is the largest producer of carbon dioxide at 72% and if the emissions from Atlantic and Indian Ocean are added to the emission from a natural process, they far much outweigh those emitted by humans. They, therefore, refute the claims that try to link the climate change to human activities and rather encourage further research on the natural processes as they note above. Thirdly, the proponents of the position note the benefits that accrue from warmer temperatures and climate. They point and present evidence that shows that the number of animal and plant species reduce as one moves away from the equator, to mean that warmer temperatures support the life of both plants and animals as opposed to the fallacy that the opposing views have presented that links human activities to climate change. They also note that in the pole regions, very few species of animals and plants can survive and live there and, hence, colder temperatures do not support life as stated by the opposing sides. To support the position further, they present evidence that shows that agricultural and human beings require warmer temperatures to survive and, hence, the increased global warming has more benefits that support the noted views and, hence, helpful to humanity survive and existence as well as agricultural production.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
On the contrary, the proponents that view human activity related to global warming and climate change present the scientific evidence from qualified and competent persons that have even won global awards such as Nobel Prizes. They, hence, believe that the intellectual abilities of the evidence presented as well as the experience that the presenters of such scientific facts and figures have to be respected for the benefits of humanity (Dickinson, McLeod, Bloomfield & Allred, 2016). The evidence asserts the highest level of carbon dioxide to be among the highest in the contemporary times when earth history is analyzed and compared. They do not just take evidence from anybody but specific competent people on the subject with numerous experiences. Secondly, the defenders of human activity note that those who refute the evidence provided have political agenda and are most likely funded by politicians who have links with business and companies that would be impacted negatively when the climate change resolutions are implemented fully as recommended by experts and analysis. It is because most of the companies are engaged in activities that pollute the environment such as emission of smoke, dust and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in the process of operating their machinery and equipment of production purposes. Thirdly, they critique the opponents of such views and question the reason they do not oppose other scientific evidence and prove not related to environment concerns such as that of the climate change and global warming. They, hence, doubt their positions and counter evidence and reasons that they give about the subject.
The strength of the first side opposing relating human activities to the climate change strong point of view is that they relate to other natural processes and compare to the impact that humans process has about climate change. It helps them support and refutes the counterclaims. The weakness is that they refuse to acknowledge scientific evidence that shows proof and evidence and, hence, argue from a generalization rather than specifics. On the contrary, the strong point view of those relating human activity has provided evidence from scientific data and profession with recognized status on the subject. The greatest weakness is that they also are puzzled with the reason that many are reluctant to embrace the evidence produced by the scientists. It indicates and shows a question and doubt about themselves.
I agree with the later views that relate and link human activity with the climate change concerns experienced in the present.
The reason I chose the latter is because I believe in scientific evidence and prove in any issue that affects humanity either in the social, political as well as economic aspects. I believe that research and study have impacted other issues positively leading to necessary measures and intervention taken to address the concern and, hence, the same should be incorporated and participated as far as climate change issue are concerned.
References
Dickinson, J. L., McLeod, P., Bloomfield, R., & Allred, S. (2016). Which Moral Foundations Predict Willingness to Make Lifestyle Changes to Avert Climate Change in the USA?. Plos ONE , 11(10), 1-11.
Eubanks, P. (2015). The Troubled Rhetoric and Communication of Climate Change: The Argumentative Situation . London: Routledge
