The character in the film that presented both their public and private self is Zuckerberg, who is a monomaniacal and arrogant person. His personality is seen in the first stances of the film, where he does not want to listen to his girlfriend, and in turn belittles her in every turn. He also does not know how to handle this situation, where he eventually loses his girlfriend. He eventually resorts to use this as a motivation to create a giant chain decision, which leads him to a more complex conflict. He is public and private social inept, where he is unable to connect with anyone; neither does he seem to care about anyone, while he is ironically trying to create one of the biggest social networking website, TheFacebook.
The scene in the film that offered a good example of perception and emotion is when Zuckerebrg is served with the letter from the Winklevoss twins, where they discuss casually issues that might be of serious concern to the performance for the company. For instance, Saverin tells Zuckerberg that he should not screw around since the letter says that they could both face legal action. The perception is created when Zuckerberg responds that, “...The letter says that I could face legal action...” this implies that Zuckerberg knows the consequences behind the acts of stealing the idea from the Winklovess twins but seems not concerned about the consequences. His emotions seem to be calm despite the fact that he is the main culprit behind the copyright of the invention.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The scene where language was the key to the understanding of the situation was when the Winklevoss twins are working out on the legal action to take against Zuckerberg. Language is used to portray Cameron as being more passive for thinking everything through, while Tyler is depicted to be more aggressive. For instance, Cameron asks why Tyler wants to hire an IP lawyer, where Narendra replies by saying that he wants to hire Sopranos to “...Beat the shit out of him with a hammer...” Here, Narendra uses the hummer as a symbol of the notion he wants to cause out of the case bearing in mind that it was a multibillion dollar invention that had been snatched away from them.
The character in the film that effectively used nonverbal communication was, where he does not only put lots of money towards the business venture to help mark achieve his dream, but he also visits mark to ensure that he is okay even after his breakup. This shows his private self, where he is caring, while his public self is shown when he becomes aggressive at times especially when he publicly reacts to the letter they received from Winklevoss. When confronted with the letter, Saverin does not take it lightly, where he retroactively proclaims, “…The letter says we could face legal action...” where this implies that he is concerned about the duels within the company.
The scene in the film that negatively portrayed the gender or cultural relationships was in the event where Zuckerberg writes an insulting entry on his blog on the affair with Albright. After his girlfriend, Zuckerberg returns and concentrates on writing on the blog, where he invents the Facemash by hacking into databases within the college to steal the photos of female students and using this cite to allow visitors to rate the impressiveness of these photos. This implies that the likes of Zuckerberg and those visiting the site could cause gender related issues, where they would use this site to discriminate against women due to the woes that befell Zuckerberg from jilted relationship.
The cultural concerns that are evident in the film are the system of rating the women according to their attractiveness. The system of rating human beings according to their attractiveness contravenes the principles of equality in the culture, where the culture presumes that human beings are created equal. Rating human beings according to any form of social physical or cultural orientation is a form of discrimination, which works against the cultural ethics and thus contravenes the cultural norms.
The scene in the film that portrayed conflict management in the film is the epilogue that stated that Cameron and Winklevoss Twins had to be awarded a settlement of up to $65 million, which was a signed and non-disclosure agreement. The agreement was perhaps one of the signatories that could end the stalemate behind the invention of Facebook as a social network. In the conflict, the Winklevoss twins had claimed that the ideology was stolen from them, while Zuckerberg claimed that it was a sole idea that he developed in a dream after a fall out with Albright his girlfriend. It is evident that from the agreement, both parties had contributed either physically or psychologically, which warranted that they would all be beneficiaries. The award to the twins sounded as a sigh of relieve to the stalemate which would be contested for years. The other agreement was when Saverin received a settlement of unknown amount during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Having been the sole financier of the project, Saverine was warranted to some sort of benefit from the project.
The major lessons for Zuckerberg is that being socially inept and lack of connection with everyone might be beneficial, although the social harm is more rampant than the moral good. This is from the fact that he diluted the shares of his project for what could have been a good fetch for a discovery if he would have worked alongside his compatriots. Sean Parker knew that being knowledgeable is a virtue, where he could sway Mark with his knowledge to his advantage. He knew that the discovery was a multimillion project and that is why he resorts to advising Mark against taking wrong advice.
Winklevoss twins learn that being confident pays. They are critically sure that they added value to what had been at one point called the Facemash, where they transformed this site to Facebook, making it one of the multibillion inventions of their time. Their confidence is seen when they follow up what is rightly acclaimed by their jury. They knew that suing the project was the only more of settling the stalemate in the project, where their confidence earned them a $65 million reward. In real life situation, on can learn that they need their partners, friends and relatives for the workability of a project, where collective responsibility is the only mode of reaping from the benefits of a project especially if it is a multibillion dollar project. This can be attributed to Zuckerberg, who needed friends for financial and social contribution to the success of a project.
