In the Expository Writing Class, we were assigned to look at a piece of writing advice and compare the advice to a professional article to ascertain whether the professional writer(s) adheres to the writing advice. In reference to Andy Fisher’s “ Essay Writing The 10 Golden Rules,”, of April 2002, we will compare Fisher’s advice on effective essay writing to Collen Vesley’s and Mark Ginsberg’s article, “ Strategies and Practices for Working with Immigrant Families in Early Education Programs”, which was published in the National Journal of Young Children of January 2011. The selected article was from a previous semester, which I had been assigned to read. I compared the authors’ article writing to online writing advice provided in, “ The 10 Golden Rules”, and the writing advice in our textbook, “ How to Write Anything. A Guide and Reference” by John J. Ruszkiewicz. From the book, the most significant piece of advice the author provides is, “develop ideas adequately” (Ruszkiewicz, 2010).
In their article, Vesley and Ginsberg discuss the significance of integrating children into the classrooms, which also help their families to be integrated into their new way of life. The authors proceed to provide additional support for the significance of enrolling immigrant children in early childhood programs and its implications not only on the children’s success in the learning institutions but also on their families’ integration into the new culture. It is quite clear the authors are keen to develop their ideas logically and chronologically to persuade readers and create a comprehensive understanding of the importance of the integration, as suggested by Ruskiewicz, 2010).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In their article, Vesley and Ginsberg also proposed the idea of building relationships with immigrant families and parents in a bid to promote early childhood development among immigrant children. The authors go on further to highlight their findings that education programs for immigrant children require an application of culture-centered/cultural-based strategies to establish healthy relations with families from other countries as well as immigrant children’s parents in their program (Vesley & Ginsberg, 2011). Vesley and Ginsberg also elaborate on the methods to be used for establishing the relationships as well as the effect that the relationships will have on childhood development among immigrant children. The authors precisely systematically develop their ideas to explain the rationale behind their assertions giving stepwise methods that need to be followed for the achievement of the desired objective. Therefore, in their article, “ Strategies and Practices for Working with Immigrant Families in Early Education Programs,” Vesley and Ginsberg stringently adhere to John Ruszkiewicz’s writing advice of “adequately developing ideas.”
Vesley and Ginsberg also emphasize the need to promote staff development as a move to facilitate the effective performance of childhood programs. The authors begin by mentioning that the attention given to staff development by the education programs is fundamental in the improvement of services rendered to immigrant children and their families. Vesley and Ginsberg proceed to elaborate on how the process of staff development should be done and provide in-depth details of how staff development may directly influence parents’ attitudes as well as immigrant children’s performance in school. From the article, it is quite evident that the authors follow the advice of stepwise development of ideas within a writing piece, as suggested by (Ruskiewicz, 2010). The way the authors develop their ideas sparks the readers' mind, and promotes deductive reasoning among the audiences.
In the review of “ The 10 Golden Rules,” rule #6, “make a point in each subsequent paragraph with a topic sentence and develop the point with textual reference and conclude with a link or summary to it in the next paragraph,” coincides with John Ruszkiewicz’s writing advice of “adequately developing ideas.” Both writing guides emphasize the need for developing the main ideas in writing to create a flow of relevant information within the text. From Vesley and Ginsberg’s article, “ Strategies and Practices for Working with Immigrant Families in Early Education Programs ,” it is quite vivid that the authors introduce the main idea in a topic sentence and expound on the concept in subsequent sections of the paragraph. For example, the authors highlight that professional development is essential in improving the quality of early childhood education for immigrant children. They begin to elaborate this assertion with a topic sentence and further proceed to explain how administrators can foster professional development with education programs for children from foreign families. In subsequent paragraphs, the authors also explain how professional development directly improves the quality of education programs designed for foreign children’s early childhood development. Vesley & Ginsberg are keen to precisely arrange and develop their ideas chronologically to provide a logical basis for their arguments and assertions.
According to Ruszkiewicz (2010), writers should create a structure for their writing by considering a simple sequence in developing ideas. He insists that one event should follow the other chronologically, and each point should always be related. What this assertion means is that one idea should be supported by the next and should also build towards a climax (Ruszkiewicz, 2010). From the Vesley’s and Ginsberg’s article, “ Strategies and Practices for Working with Immigrant Families in Early Education Programs,” it is apparent the authors sequentially arranged relevant points and adequately expounded the ideas of the article. The authors begin the article by introducing the practices and strategies for working with immigrant families to facilitate the effectiveness of early childhood education programs. The subsequent sections explain how each strategy and each practice can be executed to promote early childhood education for immigrant children. The rationale for each practice and strategy are provided in subsequent paragraphs of each section. The authors develop their ideas and assertions adequately by supporting them with relevant research data and findings. Therefore, they help readers to understand the main concepts of the article and make informed judgments on the main points. It is very vivid that Vesley and Ginsberg follow Ruszkiewicz’s writing advice of “adequately developing ideas.”
In conclusion, I believe Vesley and Ginsberg, authors of the article “ Strategies and Practices for Working with Immigrant Families in Early Education Programs,” did an exemplary job in developing the main ideas of the article adequately. As suggested by experts like John Ruszkiewicz, the authors began the subsections of the article with topic sentences and provided supporting details in subsequent paragraphs. Moreover, I feel that the article was developed logically and systemically since it flowed very well enabling the reader to understand the article’s central idea, which highlights the significance of immigrant families’ and children’s education programs. The article’s authors go further to restate the original topic sentence and the main aim of the article, which I feel acted as a reminder of the significance of the article for enlightening and educating the reading audience.
References
Fisher, A. (2002). Essay Writing The 10 Golden Rules.
Ruszkiewicz, J, J. (2010). How to Write Anything a Guide and Reference. University of Texas, Austin
Vesley, C. & Ginsberg, M., R. (2011). Strategies and Practices for Working with Immigrant Families in early Education Programs.” National Association of Education of Young Children.
