Carr, L. (2016). Legalising assisted dying is dangerous for disabled people . Not compassionate | Liz Carr. the Guardian. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/09/legalising-assisted-dying-dangerous-for-disabled-not-compassionate
In this article Carr compares euthanasia to ordinary people and to the physically challenged people suggesting that it is dangerous for physically challenged people and not compassionate. Carr explains how it will be easy for people to accept euthanasia to be done to ordinary people but not to disabled ones. The author uses the response from some Paralympian such as Marieke Vervoort who is considering euthanasia saying that the body is exhausting. However, nobody has come out to try and convince that life worthwhile, and she should attempt euthanasia. His research focuses on whether the physically challenged people should have freedom to choose to continue living with the difficulties or take euthanasia as the solution. This article is important to this topic, as Carr suggests how euthanasia can be so important to people with disabilities. However, Christians all over the world, especially in the United States disagree with legalizing euthanasia terming it as evil and against God’s plans. Thus, the author believes that in as much as euthanasia is wrong, but other people considers it crucial and helpful to them. This article is not going to be grounds for this research, but it will provide reference information about euthanasia.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Nordqvist, C. (2016). Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Medical News Today. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/182951.php
In this article, Nordqvist is talking about euthanasia and referring it by many words such as assisted suicide, physician-assisted dying or mercy killing. The author further clarifies euthanasia as voluntarily whereby the execution is made with the consent and involuntary euthanasia which is conducted without consent. His research focuses on the two procedural classifications of euthanasia, which is the passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. The article is useful to this topic because it shows the various ways of doing euthanasia. The main limitation of the article is that many doctors and relatives become afraid in signing the consent because they feel guilt since active euthanasia is more confusing than passive euthanasia. The author clarifies further that the killing should be made with the agreement of the patient. Moreover, the article will provide significant assistance in discussing the topic.
Finlay, L. (2016). Assisted dying: what can the UK learn from places where it is legal? The Guardian. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2016/jul/12/assisted-dying-uk-learn-places-legal-oregon-netherlands
In this article, Finlay explains how the United Kingdom and other countries should learn from states such as Oregon and Netherlands where euthanasia is legal. The author finds information from the families and relatives of the patient who is supposed to suffer euthanasia. His research emphases on how euthanasia is of benefit or inhumane to those who have legalized it. The article is useful in this topic to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of euthanasia and whether countries or other states should focus on legalizing it or not. The major hindrance is that legalizing euthanasia might give doctors and other practitioners a room to temper with patient’s lives. The authors indicate countries who wish to implement euthanasia should conduct more research on whether the killings will prove beneficial or will create more problems. This article, therefore, will help to determine if euthanasia is necessary to terminally ill patients or not.
Ofri, D. (2016). Patients, and Doctors, Aren't Dying at Home. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/28/patients-and-doctors-arent-dying-at-home/?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FEuthanasia&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=10&pgtype=collection&_r=0
In this article, Ofri is trying to show the relationship between the patients and doctors and the reason why euthanasia should be done to the elderly. The author indicates that when people reach a certain age, and their medical conditions are not favoring them, then they should consider withdrawal from medication plans and have a piece of mind for euthanasia. The author weighs how euthanasia might prove economical since a euthanasia injection is only $50 compared to several thousands in conducting chemotherapies. This article is crucial to the topic because it provides reasonable explanations on why euthanasia is of benefit rather than inhumane as Christians believe. The constraint of the article is that health insurance nowadays caters for medication expenses. Therefore patients will consider continuing with drugs than dying. Further, the article will help to determine those going for euthanasia wants to die, or they are doing it to stop stressing their caregivers.
Jones, D. A. (2016). Apostles of Suicide: Theological Precedent for Christian Support of 'Assisted Dying. Studies in Christian Ethics, 29(3), 331-338. Doi: 10.1177/0953946816642994
This article by David Jones explains how the Christian faith is against civil legalization of euthanasia, and therefore this model is a causes a real problem for those physically challenged people who would consider dying to stop suffering.
. In Ecclesiastes 3:2, there is a birth time and a dying day and therefore, others claim that they do not want a painful death, and rather the freedom of choosing how to die should be there. However, from the Christian view, euthanasia is illegal and against God’s plans. In Genesis 9:6, taking away innocent life is evil, and whoever kills someone, he will be killed. Christian believes that no matter how someone is sick, assisting the person to die is against human rights it is a crime.
How Ethical Systems Change: Tolerable Suffering and Assisted Dying. (2011). doi:10.4324/9780203127865
This book indicates the various ways in which the world has changed and the dawn of euthanasia in America. The author’s research proves that many people in the United States prefer going for euthanasia than suffering terminal sicknesses. However, according to Christians, euthanasia is a homicide, and many countries take serious action if someone kills another. In Deuteronomy 32:39, God is the giver and taker of living and that people have no jurisdiction and without the mandate to end live. Through this bible chapter, Christians in America believe that legalizing euthanasia will motivate those vulnerable people to commit murder. Nevertheless, life is a precious gift from God and in Hebrew 12:7; Christians should bear hardship as discipline for they are the sons of God.
In conclusion, Christians know that God is in control of life, and he is the only person who should take it away. Besides, Christians considers that caring for the dying people is the most compassionate thing in the world but condemns any form of killing.
Reference
Assisted dying laws. (2015). The Pharmaceutical Journal . doi:10.1211/pj.2015.20067617
Carr, L. (2016 ). Legalising assisted dying is dangerous for disabled people . Not compassionate | Liz Carr. the Guardian. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/09/legalising-assisted-dying-dangerous-for-disabled-not-compassionate
Davies, E. (2013). Assisted dying: What happens after Vermont ? Bmj, 346(Jun24 2). doi:10.1136/bmj.f4041
Finlay, L. (2016). Assisted dying: what can the UK learn from places where it is legal?. the Guardian. Retrieved 11 September 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2016/jul/12/assisted-dying-uk-learn-places-legal-oregon-netherlands
How Ethical Systems Change: Tolerable Suffering and Assisted Dying . (2011). doi:10.4324/9780203127865
Jones, D. A. (2016). Apostles of Suicide: Theological Precedent for Christian Support of 'Assisted Dying . Studies in Christian Ethics, 29(3), 331-338. doi:10.1177/0953946816642994
Koch, T. (2011). Assisted dying versus assisted living . Bmj, 342(May25 1), D3184-D3184. doi:10.1136/bmj.d3184
Nordqvist, C. (2016). Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Medical News Today . Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/182951.php
Ofri, D. (2016). Patients, and Doctors, Aren't Dying at Home . Retrieved 11 September 2016, from http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/28/patients-and-doctors-arent-dying-at-home/?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FEuthanasia&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=10&pgtype=collection&_r=0
Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides?: Abortion, Neonatal Care, Assisted Dying, and Capital Punishment. (2011). doi:10.4324/9780203182277
