Firearm control is a challenge that the United States encounter on a daily basis. In fact, firearms are among the major causes of uncommon deaths. The Second Amendment protects our right to keep and bear arms, supported by the Brady law, which ensures that irresponsible users of firearms are not given the chance to own them. For many decades now, firearms have been determined to be a murder machine. Over 50 percent of the citizens of America possess some kind of firearms for their protection, making the guns to be part of their lives. It is not surprising the criminal cases are still high in the country. Therefore, ownership of firearms should be more strictly controlled in the United States.
The implementation of the Brady Act supports the view that ownership of firearms should be more strictly controlled in the United States. In favor of the Brady Act implementation, the percentage of criminal activities has fallen by 25. Some people in the United States have always misused their guns due to mental illnesses, or out of drug addiction, as ex-felons or juveniles. Therefore, strict control of ownership of firearms should be ensured such that a background check is done for any purchases to establish if he can be responsible with the possession of a gun. Keeping firearms out of the possession of dangerous people should be the major goal of any United States firearm control policy. Ultimately, such moves bring down the rates of crimes in homes and in the streets because of irresponsible persons.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The second amendment Bill of rights allows people to be entitled to keep and bear arms. Firearms could be used responsibly for protection. The time the Second Amendment was being approved, firearms were parts of the items that were being owned normally homes. In 2004, about 310,000,000 guns were privately owned within households in the United States. It explains the extended debate regarding the Second Amendment right. However, the greatest reasoning supporting the Second Amendment right is that individuals feel more secure when holding or possessing a gun. Considering that the statement is a fact, gun control will also be significant, as it will guarantee comfort on the people.
As much as guns are utilized in the protection of people, the rights can be breached to the point that the people are using it for militia activities. About 82 percent of Americans find the second amendment beneficial to some point. Unfortunately, it exposes people to many risks, particularly those surrounding them. However, to bring down the number of deaths, burglaries, and other deviant activities, laws need to be instituted to monitor and regulate firearms utilization. On the other hand, gun owners are bound to be negligent because murdering someone may seem normal to them. Even though the Second Amendment right was critical in terms of protection in the past, decades later, guns have been converted to murdering machines. It was not intended for that from the beginning.
In conclusion, residents of the United States should not be allowed to carry firearms if they have not been extensively scrutinized. Although the major drive for possessing firearms is for protection, some people have always taken advantage of this to use them for crimes. Some people may oppose that guns do not kill but instead, some handle it irresponsibly that end up murdering others yearly. Firearms can be threatening, particularly when thousands are murdered because of misusing these firearms, or them being in the arms of irresponsible persons.
Word count: 580 words
References
Azrael, D., Hepburn, L., Hemenway, D., & Miller, M. (2017). The stock and flow of US firearms: results from the 2015 National Firearms Survey. RSF .
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/677232/pdf
Hemenway, D. (2017). Private guns, public health . University of Michigan Press. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Philip_Cook2/publication/246009669_Book_Review_Private_Guns_Public_Health_By_David_Hemenway_326_pp_Ann_Arbor/links/582b035508ae004f74af79e1/Book-Review-Private-Guns-Public-Health-By-David-Hemenway-326-pp-Ann-Arbor.pdf
Jones, M. A., & Stone, G. W. (2015). The US gun-control paradox: Gun buyer response to congressional gun-control initiatives. Journal of Business & Economics Research (Online) , 13 (4), 167. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/George_Stone/publication/295503230_The_US_Gun-Control_Paradox_Gun_Buyer_Response_To_Congressional_Gun-Control_Initiatives/links/571109a108aeebe07c023d37.pdf
