Introduction
Economic benefits and human rights and freedom issues have been dominant in the call for legalization and decriminalization of drugs proponents. The legalization of medicinal cannabis and use of marijuana for leisure are some of the most concerning drug policies (Caulkins, 2016). Proponents have argued that legitimization of such drugs boosts tax revenues from the drug sale. These assumptions are justified in the essence that taxations of drugs are almost twice that of other products in the bid to discourage their use. Tobacco, for instance, is heavily taxed with the warnings about its harms been on the packets. Smoking for all its dangerous in causing chronic ailments take a long time to affect the user and is not classified in the same category as other harder narcotics such as heroin and cocaine.
Different proponents have echoed the social aspects that depict that adults have the right to do whatever they want as long as they do not affect others. The claims are supported by other social and criminality scholars arguing that the move to legalize marijuana has reduced crimes in most states since the people can access the products from legal and safe dealers compared to earlier illegal dealers who would steal or violate the rights of the buyers. The surveys undertaken by these studies depict that police can enhance security by focusing on other issues rather than concentrate their resources on handling drug trafficking (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Governors Highway Safety Association, & the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. 2017). The proponents of drugs legalization may be spot-on in their studies, but they lack the conviction and humanity required to understand the aspects of drugs legalization (Bogart, Pillay, & ProQuest, 2016). The capitalistic ideas and the calls for rights and freedoms is a cheap shot rather than a realistic review of the consequences that such a move would lead to in the long-run. Drug abuse is one of the leading problems in the U.S. with families enduring challenges due to the high addiction and crimes.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Thesis
Humanity and social aspects of the problem is a clear indication the flaws of capitalizing everything is detrimental to the moral and social benefits. Therefore, researching to determine the best solution in the drugs legalization debate calls for understanding the different aspects of proponents and opponents of legalization (Goldstein, 2010). Based on the social characters and consequences of drug abuse this study depicts that fighting against legalization of drugs is the best way to enhance sanity, security and socioeconomic development.
Literature Review
According to DEA report in 2010, the call for drugs legalization is based on misconception and untrue analysis. The report condemned the claim that legalization of hard narcotics would reduce crime as delusional since criminals will always be criminals even if the drugs are legalized. The DEA (2010) study uses Mexico as a reference to demonstrate that the violence and crime are only expected to increase in the long-run. The Mexican cartels have engaged in many drugs murders with territories domination expanding the conflict. The over 16.8 metric tons of cocaine from Mexico and Columbia in the tight security that enter the U.S. and the methamphetamine is just a depiction of the catastrophic quantities that would flood the market if these drugs were legal. The $18 to $39 billion laundered from the country depicts that the legalization of the narcotics will only result in high amounts of money laundering with the legitimization providing loopholes for the cartels to flood the market with illegal drugs. The increment of drugs quantity and their availability is expected to increase the drug abuse and addiction problems that have raised the health care costs (DEA, 2010). These issues demonstrate that the arguments used by the proponents are contrary to their presentations thus calls for a more conclusive use of data and scholarly journals to solve the debate on this essential and life-changing policies.
References
Bogart, W. A., Pillay, S., & ProQuest (Firm). (2016). Off the street: Legalizing drugs .
Caulkins, J. P. (2016). Marijuana legalization . Oxford University Press.
DEA. (2010). SPEAKING OUT Against Drug Legalization. Dea.gov . Retrieved March 27, 2018, from https://www.dea.gov/pr/multimedia-library/publications/speaking_out.pdf
Goldstein, M. J. (2010). Legalizing Drugs: Crime Stopper or Social Risk? . New York: Lerner Digital.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Governors Highway Safety Association, & the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. (2017, June). Impact of the legalization and decriminalization of marijuana on the DWI system: Highlights from the expert panel meeting (Report No. DOT HS 812 430). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
