Indeed a standard language is a depiction of a country’s national identity. In America, the issue of dialect is notably controversial. Dialect depicts a person’s heritage or background. To communicate with individuals in a community, a person must be able to understand the language the society members speak. In spite of the various dialects Americans have, it is essential to have a standard language or dialect. This standpoint, however, does not to imply that the diverse dialects ought to be eliminated altogether, considering they reflect the diversity from which the US draws its pride (Smitherman, 1995). For the regular activities, then it is vital to have one standard language or dialect.
For official functions, there is a need for order and formality. A standard dialect can contribute to the realization of these. For instance, in the school setting, the use of different dialects can bring about confusion. In the office environment, the use of a standard dialect ensures that officers can have a common understanding of their roles and responsibilities. Besides, the government organs such as congress, the executive, and the judiciary cannot afford to have people using different dialects. There is the need to ensure that the communication is standard and orderly.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Coming up with a standard dialect requires the effort of professionals. However, at the same time, it is imperative to take into consideration the opinion of the masses. For this reason, the government should put in place a professional institution that derives a standard dialect. The exercise ought to be impartial and objective. During the process, it is essential to consult the masses and to put their views into consideration. The learning institutions need to contribute a crucial role in the exercise as well. Once the standard language is delivered, then it is more prudent to call for a vote. In case the majority is okay with it, then it is put into practice.
References
Smitherman, G. (1995). "Students' Right to Their Own Language": A Retrospective. The English Journal, 84 (1), 21-27. doi:10.2307/820470
