Writing Identity: How to Write About Yourself

Introduction 

Writing difficulties can devastate education and self-esteem for a child. Every inspired writer starts from childhood as they try to perfect their writing skills and deliver great work. As children advance through education, they are gradually required to write on several different topics. If a child does not learn any necessary skills, he may not write with the pace and fluency needed to exceed these demands. Writing is typically nervous and sometimes an indicator that a writer is worried about doing well. This stress-induced approach and attitude may positively value as it motivates the writer to reflect and attempt to compose. Many years of my writing process, I was inspired that most of the students cited the books. In my opinion, I had to follow very strict rules to write a good essay, including a "five-paragraph" theme. The thesis about the opening paragraph, three points mentioned in three corporate paragraphs, and a conclusion make a different summary or re-examine everything. It's funny because it's so true, we've got to learn some skills in all kinds of writings to become a good writer. After that, at least with the basic knowledge of most styles, we can use everything we collect in one particular category and give it a "special taste." It's much more fun to read by adding different techniques to a style of writing because it's not written "the same way," because there are bits of various seasonings 

From the text "What Happens When People Write?" an excellent overview of the writing process is provided by the researcher, Maxine Hairston. She takes out the myth that professional authors are a magical breed, free of the difficulties we, the dead, face. According to her, professional authors have a different way of handling these issues. They are not panic, and they are not allowed to be overtaken by fear. They are having a tough time starting, and "rarely do they know what exactly they are about to write before they start." By doing so, she inspires and gives us the confidence that we will, at the very least, become outstanding writers if we continue to write. But she is frank and does not dispute the truth that excellent authors must also be gifted. Her attitude to being a good writer was what I could tell that stuck out for me. A golden recipe to success, she never gave a particular route. Instead, she was very frank, claiming that there was nothing like this and that all writing pieces have a start, a core, and an end. That it is not so easy to be perfect, of course; the beginning or the starting point must take us on our 'travel.' The middle must be the path to our last destination, which has often been called the end. But it wouldn't be remarkable even that. 

Lamott suggests that most people are different from the writing itself in their interpretations of how authors work. In paragraph 1, she refers to it as 'the imagination of the uninitiated.' She means it is rarely the same level of polished work as when authors are sitting down to type their first draft. Indeed, the authors typed a completely awful first draft most of the time. The notion that some people can only spit out correctly when writing about their first time in what they call "the uninitiated's fantasy." She says she trusts the writing process 'more or less' because it can be disconcerting to turn a written paper so severely into good writing even though writing the first draft to be composed. "It would be so long, incoherent, and horrible for Lamott to obsess about being creamed by a vehicle for the rest of the day before we could make a decent second draft." This tension, since we need to depend halfway on the fact that our first insane draft will eventually be made a coherent text, is a feeling felt by all authors. Lamott herself says that. I claim that because when I have to write my first draft, I always feel it myself. Lamott says it is all about the method to compose the first draft. As for my initial drafts, I must accept that this phase is more critical. It feels like I vomit on the paper when I write my first draft. I write and typically end with a full fire of a dump. However, it is often easier to bring my thoughts together and choose the most important ideas I want to share from this garbage. It may not be pretty to write the first draft, but it is necessary to write. 

I mostly admired this book because it presents language rather than the standard Black and White rules, as a selection of options, a grayscale. Dreyer does an outstanding job when and why those options are taken and then recommends a course. This background is much better than other grammar lessons. In chapter one, Dreyer talks about the life magic of tidying up in your writing and how one follows with the writing. Chapter two introduces why there are Rules and non-rules in writing. It explains the rules that need to be followed when writing and the rules that may not be followed. However, he wonders why there are non-rules because they are unhelpful and pointless. 

Conclusion 

In conclusion, writing can be very challenging because perfectionism is exhausting. The texts don't end up that way, even though you try to make it acceptable. The method is just annoying and confusing. You can be too burned even to get started sometimes because you know that it ends in tears. This is what makes perfectionism the worst thing. It can hinder artists from doing something. Therefore, from all the authors, I have come to understand that writing can be very challenging to most people, but it also depends on one's determination to complete their drafts.